Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40341645›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An automated hip fracture detection, classification system on pelvic radiographs and comparison with 35 clinicians.

Abdurrahim Yilmaz, Kadir Gem, Mucahit Kalebasi, Rahmetullah Varol, Zuhtu Oner Gencoglan, Yegor Samoylenko, Hakan Koray Tosyali, Guvenir Okcu, Huseyin Uvet

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Abdurrahim YilmazDivision of Systems Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion, and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. a.yilmaz23@imperial.ac.uk.
Kadir GemDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Manisa Alasehir State Hospital, 45600, Manisa, Turkey.
Mucahit KalebasiMechatronics Engineering Department, Yildiz Technical University, 34349, Istanbul, Turkey.
Rahmetullah VarolMechatronics Engineering Department, Yildiz Technical University, 34349, Istanbul, Turkey.
Zuhtu Oner GencoglanDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Manisa City Hospital, 45040, Manisa, Turkey.
Yegor SamoylenkoMechatronics Engineering Department, Yildiz Technical University, 34349, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hakan Koray TosyaliDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Manisa Celal Bayar University Hafsa Sultan Hospital, 45030, Manisa, Turkey.
Guvenir OkcuDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Manisa Celal Bayar University Hafsa Sultan Hospital, 45030, Manisa, Turkey.
Huseyin UvetMechatronics Engineering Department, Yildiz Technical University, 34349, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis of orthopedic injuries, especially pelvic and hip fractures, is vital in trauma management. While pelvic radiographs (PXRs) are widely used, misdiagnosis is common. This study proposes an automated system that uses convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to detect potential fracture areas and predict fracture conditions, aiming to outperform traditional object detection-based systems. We developed two deep learning models for hip fracture detection and prediction, trained on PXRs from three hospitals. The first model utilized automated hip area detection, cropping, and classification of the resulting patches. The images were preprocessed using the Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE) algorithm. The YOLOv5 architecture was employed for the object detection model, while three different pre-trained deep neural network (DNN) architectures were used for classification, applying transfer learning. Their performance was evaluated on a test dataset, and compared with 35 clinicians. YOLOv5 achieved a 92.66% accuracy on regular images and 88.89% on CLAHE-enhanced images. The classifier models, MobileNetV2, Xception, and InceptionResNetV2, achieved accuracies between 94.66% and 97.67%. In contrast, the clinicians demonstrated a mean accuracy of 84.53% and longer prediction durations. The DNN models showed significantly better accuracy and speed compared to human evaluators (p < 0.0005, p < 0.01). These DNN models highlight promising utility in trauma diagnosis due to their high accuracy and speed. Integrating such systems into clinical practices may enhance the diagnostic efficiency of PXRs.

Indexed as

Hip FracturesPelvic BonesPelvisRadiographyAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansNeural Networks, ComputerAutomated fracture detectionHip fracturesPelvis X-ray

Identifiers

PMID40341645
PMCPMC12062471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.