Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40341642›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Gut microbiome and blood biomarkers reveal differential responses to aerobic and anaerobic exercise in collegiate men of diverse training backgrounds.

Kinga Humińska-Lisowska, Monika Michałowska-Sawczyn, Tomasz Kosciolek, Paweł P Łabaj, Andrzej Kochanowicz, Jan Mieszkowski, Patrizia Proia, Paweł Cięszczyk, Kinga Zielińska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kinga Humińska-LisowskaFaculty of Physical Culture, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdansk, Poland. kinga.huminska-lisowska@awf.gda.pl.
Monika Michałowska-SawczynFaculty of Physical Culture, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdansk, Poland.
Tomasz KosciolekSano Centre for Computational Medicine, Krakow, Poland.
Paweł P ŁabajMalopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
Andrzej KochanowiczFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Lomza, Lomza, Poland.
Jan MieszkowskiFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Lomza, Lomza, Poland.
Patrizia ProiaSport and Exercise Sciences Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Paweł CięszczykFaculty of Physical Culture, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdansk, Poland.
Kinga ZielińskaMalopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2018/29/N/NZ7/02800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiome influences physiological responses to exercise by modulating inflammatory markers and metabolite production. Athletes typically exhibit greater microbial diversity, which may be associated with improved performance, but the mechanisms linking different exercise modalities to the gut microbiome are not fully understood. In this study, blood and stool samples were collected from endurance athletes, strength athletes, and non-athletic controls performing two maximal exercise tests (the anaerobic Wingate test and the aerobic Bruce Treadmill Test) to integrate serum biomarker data with gut bacterial metagenomic profiles. While most biochemical markers showed similar post-exercise trends across groups, SPARC (secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine) and adiponectin levels showed modality-specific responses. Strength-trained participants showed unique microbiome-biomarker associations after the Wingate test. In addition, baseline enrichment of certain bacterial taxa, including Clostridium phoceensis and Catenibacterium spp., correlated with reduced Bruce Treadmill test response in strength-trained individuals. These findings, while requiring further validation, indicate the complex interplay between exercise type, training background, and the gut microbiome, and suggest that specific microbial species may help shape recovery and adaptation.

Indexed as

BiomarkersExerciseGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAdultAnaerobiosisAthletesExercise TestFecesHumansMaleYoung AdultBiomarkersAerobic and anaerobic exerciseAthletic performanceGut MicrobiomeInflammatory biomarkersMetabolic adaptationMicrobiome‒host crosstalk

Identifiers

PMID40341642
PMCPMC12062308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.