ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting onward care needs at admission to reduce discharge delay using explainable machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Predicting the need for long-term care: development and comparative evaluation of advanced machine learning models].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2026Article
- Impact of accurate initial discharge planning and inpatient transfers of care on discharge delays: a retrospective cohort study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Preparing hospitals and health organizations for AI: practical guidelines for the required infrastructure.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early identification of patients who require onward referral to social care can prevent delays to discharge from hospital. We introduce an explainable machine learning (ML) model to identify potential social care needs at the first point of admission. This model was trained using routinely collected data on patient admissions, hospital spells and discharge at a large tertiary hospital in the UK between 2017 and 2023. The model performance (one-vs-rest AUROC = 0.915 [0.907 0.924] (95% confidence interval), is comparable to clinician's predictions of discharge care needs, despite working with only a subset of the information available to the clinician. We find that ML and clinicians perform better for identifying different types of care needs, highlighting the added value of a potential system supporting decision making. We also demonstrate the ability for ML to provide automated initial discharge need assessments, in the instance where initial clinical assessment is delayed and provide reasoning for the decision. Finally, we demonstrate that combining clinician and machine predictions, in a hybrid model, provides even more accurate early predictions of onward social care requirements (OVR AUROC = 0.936 [0.928 0.943]) and demonstrates the potential for human-in-the-loop decision support systems in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.