ArticleScientific reports2025
A case series shows a relation between intracochlear electric field distribution and vestibular co-stimulation with cochlear implants.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Biophysical Model for Simultaneous Cochlear and Vestibular Nerve Stimulation: Insights into Neural Activation and Crosstalk in Inner Ear Implants.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the relation between the electric field distribution within the cochlea during cochlear implant stimulation and the electrical vestibular co-stimulation measured by vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (e-VEMPs). Measurements were done in adult Nucleus cochlear implant (CI) users with perimodiolar electrode arrays. The electric field distribution within the cochlea was determined by Transimpedance Matrices recorded for all participants with a pulse width of 25 µs and a current level of 110 CL. Study measurements were conducted in 25 ears of 24 participants. In 10 participants, e-VEMPs could be elicited (40%). The occurrence of e-VEMPs stimulated by the cochlear implant was correlated with the magnitude of a corrected transimpedance at the most basal electrode. Since the results also suggest that there are patients with vestibular co-stimulation already present at their everyday CI stimulation level, this needs to be taken into account by audiologists creating programming maps for CIs, e.g. by deactivation of basal electrode contacts, if dizziness occurs during CI stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.