ArticleScientific reports2025
Cell therapy with placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis patients in a phase 1 clinical trial.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in the clinical application of mesenchymal stem cells for neurological disorders.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- Review
- Mesenchymal stromal cells and neuroinflammation: a multimodal approach to neuroprotection and future therapeutic horizons.Translational neurodegeneration · 2026Review
- Cell Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical Advances, Limitations, and Future Perspectives from Clinical Studies-A Systematic Review.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- The Potential of β-Synuclein-Specific Regulatory T Cell Therapy as a Treatment for Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) has attracted significant attention in clinical research due to their immunomodulatory properties and potential to reduce inflammation in autoimmune disorders, such as multiple sclerosis (MS). This study evaluates the safety and feasibility of placenta-derived MSCs (PLMSCs) in five participants with secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). The primary outcomes focused on safety and tolerability, assessed through adverse event monitoring over six months. Secondary exploratory outcomes included clinical, imaging, and immunological measures. Patients underwent baseline evaluations and follow-up assessments comprising cognitive and psychological assessments, expanded disability status scale (EDSS), clinical signs, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), functional MRI (fMRI), cytokine levels (IL-10, IL-6, IL-17, TNFα), and CD20/CD19 B cell marker analysis. No serious complications were noted, except for temporary headache in two patients, which was resolved with tablet. Results demonstrated sustained improvements in clinical outcomes, as indicated by significant reductions in EDSS scores (P < 0.0001), cognitive and psychological assessments, and radial diffusivity (RD) indices (P = 0.0186) in DTI metrics over six months. Furthermore, fMRI analysis showed significant enhancements in brain connectivity and cognitive function. Immunologically, CD20/CD19 B cell markers decreased significantly (P = 0.0077), and anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 increased alongside reductions in pro-inflammatory TNFα, IL-6, and IL-17 (P < 0.0001) three months post-therapy. These findings suggest PLMSC transplantation is safe and feasible in SPMS patients. While exploratory outcomes indicate potential clinical and immunological benefits, this phase 1 trial was not designed to assess efficacy. Larger, controlled phase II trials are warranted to validate these preliminary observations and investigate PLMSCs' therapeutic potential in MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.