Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40341575›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Lawful kinematics link eye movements to the limits of high-speed perception.

Martin Rolfs, Richard Schweitzer, Eric Castet, Tamara L Watson, Sven Ohl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Object continuity through invisible retinal motion at saccadic speed.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Blink and you see it.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Martin Rolfs *Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. martin.rolfs@hu-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8214-8556
Richard Schweitzer *Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1781-572X
Eric CastetCentre de Recherche en Psychologie et Neurosciences, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6698-5111
Tamara L WatsonSchool of Social Sciences, Western Sydney University, NSW, Sydney, Australia.
Sven OhlDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0292-2151

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) EXC 2002/1 Science of Intelligence, project no. 390523135Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) RO 3579/10-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) RO 3579/12-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) RO 3579/2-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) RO 3579/8-1EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 865715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perception requires active sampling of the environment. What part of the physical world can be perceived is limited by the sensory system's biophysical setup, but might be further constrained by the kinematic bounds of the motor actions used to acquire sensory information. Here, we tested this fundamental idea for humans' fastest and most frequent behavior-saccadic eye movements-which entail incidental sensory consequences (i.e., swift retinal motion) that rarely reach awareness in natural vision. Using high-speed video projection, we display rapidly moving stimuli that faithfully reproduce, or deviate from, saccades' lawful relation of velocity, duration, and amplitude. For each stimulus, observers perform perceptual tasks for which performance is contingent on consciously seeing the stimulus' motion trajectory. We uncover that visibility of the stimulus' movement is well predicted by the specific kinematics of saccades and their sensorimotor contingencies, reflecting even variability between individual observers. Computational modeling shows that spatiotemporal integration during early visual processing predicts this lawful relation in a tight range of biologically plausible parameters. These results suggest that the visual system takes into account motor kinematics when omitting an action's incidental sensory consequences, thereby preserving visual sensitivity to high-speed object motion.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsMotion PerceptionSaccadesVisual PerceptionAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40341575
PMCPMC12062296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.