Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40341573›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Smart indoor monitoring for disabled individuals using an ensemble of deep learning models in an IoT environment.

Faisal S Alsubaei, Abdulrahman A Alshdadi, Mohammed Rizwanullah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Faisal S AlsubaeiDepartment of Cybersecurity, College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Jeddah, 21959, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. fsalsubaei@uj.edu.sa.
Abdulrahman A AlshdadiDepartment of Information Systems and Technology, College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed RizwanullahDepartment of Computer and Self Development, Preparatory Year Deanship, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, AlKharj, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

King Salman Center for Disability Research KSRG-2024- 131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indoor activity monitoring methods assurance the well-being and security of disabled and aging individuals living in their homes. These models utilize numerous technologies and sensors to monitor day-to-day work like movement, medication adherence, and sleep patterns, and provide valued perceptions of the user's everyday life and entire health. Internet of Things (IoT) based health systems have an important part in medical assistance and help in enhancing data processing and its prediction. Communicating data or reports requires more time and energy, in addition to causing energy problems and greater latency. Currently, numerous studies focus on human activity recognition (HAR) using deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML) methods, but more effort is needed to enhance HAR models for disabled individuals. Therefore, this article presents a Smart Indoor Monitoring for Disabled People Using an Ensemble of Deep Learning Models in an Internet of Things Environment (SIMDP-EDLIoT) technique. The SIMDP-EDLIoT model is designed to monitor and detect various conditions and activities within indoor spaces for disabled people. Initially, the SIMDP-EDLIoT approach uses linear scaling normalization (LSN) to ensure that the input data is scaled appropriately. Besides, the Improved Osprey Optimization Algorithm (IOOA)-based feature selection is employed to classify the most relevant features, enhancing the efficiency of the system by reducing dimensionality. For monitoring indoor activities, an ensemble of three DL techniques such as bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM), gated recurrent unit (GRU), and conditional variational autoencoder (CVAE) are employed. Experimental study is performed to underscore the importance of the SIMDP-EDLIoT method under the HAR dataset. The comparative analysis of the SIMDP-EDLIoT method demonstrated a superior performance with an accuracy of 98.85%, precision of 97.71%, sensitivity of 97.70%, specificity of 99.24%, and F-measure of 97.70%, outperforming existing approaches across all metrics.

Indexed as

Deep LearningInternet of ThingsPersons with DisabilitiesAlgorithmsHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicDeep learningDisabled peopleEnsemble modelIndoor monitoringInternet of ThingsLinear scaling normalization

Identifiers

PMID40341573
PMCPMC12062302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.