Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40341547›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Multidisciplinary discussion on phenotypical characterization of metastatic breast cancer and patient pathway optimization from an expert panel across South Italian regions.

Raffaele Ardito, Grazia Arpino, Roberta Caputo, Mariangela Ciccarese, Sabino De Placido, Francesco Giotta, Rosamaria Iommelli, Mihaela Nica, Michele Orditura, Daniela Russo and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Raffaele ArditoOncological Day Hospital, IRCCS Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata (CROB), Rionero in Vulture, PZ, Italy.
Grazia ArpinoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Corso Umberto I, 40, 80138, Naples, Italy. grazia.arpino@unina.it.
Roberta CaputoDepartment of Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-"Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
Mariangela CiccareseRegional Health and Social Agency (AReSS Puglia), Bari, Italy.
Sabino De PlacidoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Corso Umberto I, 40, 80138, Naples, Italy.
Francesco GiottaIRCCS Cancer Institute "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy.
Rosamaria IommelliU.O.C. Formazione, Ricerca e Cooperazione Internazionale, Antonio Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Mihaela NicaSpecialist in Infectious Diseases, Naples, Italy.
Michele OrdituraDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Daniela RussoDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Section of Pathological Anatomy, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy.
Luigia Stefania StucciUOC University Medical Oncology, AOU Polyclinic of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Francesco Alfredo ZitoIRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) might change its receptor status during malignant progression, resulting in challenging clinical care. The project, developed during two residential meetings by expert Italian oncologists and pathologists, was aimed at optimizing metastatic BC management. A 17-point survey was administered to healthcare workers in centers of three regions, essentially to assess the perception of metastasis biopsy on treatment choice in different BC molecular subtypes, the appropriate timing for performing tissue and liquid biopsy in metastatic BC, the selection of target genes and the use of multidisciplinary approaches in tumour management. Nineteen centers participated in the survey. The first important finding was that most centers manage more than 150 patients yearly, and 95% have a pathology department. Some questions received a substantial agreement: tissue biopsy of metastatic BC was largely considered as mandatory, generally performed at onset of metastatic disease. Liquid biopsy is not used by all centers, confirming its strict dependency on the available technologies. The answers on the therapeutic line change in case of HER2 + disease becoming triple negative confirmed an attitude consistent with clinical practice. The survey also revealed that half of the interviewed oncologists discuss with multidisciplinary team only for selected cases. The survey revealed that while a shared consensus exists on the importance of metastasis biopsy, some areas still deserve attention to achieve standardized approaches: interdisciplinary collaboration and more effective communication between specialists and patients are necessary to optimize the diagnostic and therapeutic journey of women with metastatic BC.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationItalyNeoplasm MetastasisPatient Care TeamPhenotypeSurveys and QuestionnairesErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesBreast cancer molecular subtypeIntratumoral heterogeneityLiquid biopsyMetastasis biopsyMetastatic breast cancerTumour phenotypical characterization

Identifiers

PMID40341547
PMCPMC12062358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.