ArticleScientific reports2025
Multidisciplinary discussion on phenotypical characterization of metastatic breast cancer and patient pathway optimization from an expert panel across South Italian regions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) might change its receptor status during malignant progression, resulting in challenging clinical care. The project, developed during two residential meetings by expert Italian oncologists and pathologists, was aimed at optimizing metastatic BC management. A 17-point survey was administered to healthcare workers in centers of three regions, essentially to assess the perception of metastasis biopsy on treatment choice in different BC molecular subtypes, the appropriate timing for performing tissue and liquid biopsy in metastatic BC, the selection of target genes and the use of multidisciplinary approaches in tumour management. Nineteen centers participated in the survey. The first important finding was that most centers manage more than 150 patients yearly, and 95% have a pathology department. Some questions received a substantial agreement: tissue biopsy of metastatic BC was largely considered as mandatory, generally performed at onset of metastatic disease. Liquid biopsy is not used by all centers, confirming its strict dependency on the available technologies. The answers on the therapeutic line change in case of HER2 + disease becoming triple negative confirmed an attitude consistent with clinical practice. The survey also revealed that half of the interviewed oncologists discuss with multidisciplinary team only for selected cases. The survey revealed that while a shared consensus exists on the importance of metastasis biopsy, some areas still deserve attention to achieve standardized approaches: interdisciplinary collaboration and more effective communication between specialists and patients are necessary to optimize the diagnostic and therapeutic journey of women with metastatic BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.