ArticleScientific reports2025
Assessment of lumbosacral spinal curvatures before and after surgery using 3D posturography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Giant Retroperitoneal Lumbar Schwannoma with Extensive Vertebral Body Erosion Managed Without Spinal Instrumentation: The Potential Role of Hounsfield Unit Assessment in Surgical Decision-Making.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Risk Factors for Postoperative Complications in Different Fusion Surgical Approaches for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Dural Sac Cross-Sectional Area Measurement as an Indicator of Cauda Equina Syndrome Risk in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Effect of High Pelvic Incidence on Fixation Failure in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Low-Grade Spondylolisthesis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Minimally Invasive Robotic-Assisted Complex Adult Spinal Deformity Correction in a Surgical Specialty Hospital: Bringing Adult Spinal Deformity Care Closer to Home.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Streamlined and efficient patient-specific modeling for lumbar spine segmentation and finite element analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative Outcomes of 1-Level vs. 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Traumatic Bilateral Lumbosacral Jumped Facet Without Fracture in Childhood: Case Report and Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Open discectomy remains the standard procedure for decompressing neural structures in cases of intervertebral disc herniation. Early postoperative rehabilitation emphasizes protecting the surgical site while restoring functional independence in daily activities. In the absence of possibilities for performing any spinal control tests within the first few days post-surgery, the dynamism of curvature changes may be the sole criterion for evaluating rehabilitation progress. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of utilizing the non-invasive KINEOD device to measure the dynamics of lumbosacral spinal alignment parameters in the sagittal plane before and immediately after surgical intervention. The study involved 30 patients (14 women [46.67%] and 16 men [53.33%]) from the Neurosurgical Department of the Wojewódzki Szpital Specjalistyczny in Słupsk, Poland. Data were collected using a custom questionnaire and KINEOD 3D posturography to assess body posture. The following parameters were analyzed: Sagittal Inclination Angle (Sagittal IA), Kyphosis Angle (KA), Lordosis Angle (LA), Sacral Inclination Angle (Sacral IA), Lordosis Measure (LM), Inflection Point (IP), and the Angle of Acromion-Posterior Superior Iliac Spine Rotation (A-PSIS). Measurements were conducted at three stages: Stage I - one day before surgery (2:00 PM); Stage II - on the third postoperative day (7:00 AM); and Stage III - on the third postoperative day (2:00 PM). Measurements utilizing the KINEOD device revealed statistically significant changes between Stage I and Stage II for the following parameters: Sagittal IA, KA, LA, Sacral IA, LM, IP, and A-PSIS. Significant changes were also noted between Stage I and Stage III for KA, LA, Sacral IA, LM, A-PSIS, and VAS. The study highlights that the reliability of KINEOD 3D assessment diminishes when relying solely on parameters such as Sacral IA and IP for postoperative lordosis evaluation. For rapid, non-invasive assessment of the lumbosacral spine post-surgery, Sacral IA may serve as a more accurate indicator of dynamic changes in the lower lumbar region. Postoperative alterations in all sagittal plane angles are influenced by both surgical intervention and, to a lesser extent, the diurnal adaptation rhythm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.