Trial reportScientific reports2025
Vonoprazan-based therapy versus standard regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection management in Egypt: an open-label randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Vonoprazan-based Therapy Versus Standard Regimen for Helicobacter Pylori Infection Management
Comparative Study Evaluating Safety and Effectiveness of ( Proton Pump Inhibitor Versus Vonoprazan ) Based Triple Therapy With or Without Zinc to Eradicate H. Pylori Infection
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolving landscape of potassium-competitive acid blockers: toward disease-specific use beyond acid suppression.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Vonoprazan-Amoxicillin Dual Therapy Versus Clarithromycin-Based Standard Triple Therapy forJournal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Breaking barriers in the first-lineWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Comparison of Vonoprazan and Low-Dose Amoxicillin Dual Therapy with Bismuth-Containing Quadruple Therapy for NaïveAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Therapeutic advances and future directions inFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As antibiotic resistance continues to rise, the development of novel H. pylori treatment regimens, combined with regular assessment of existing treatment regimens, is imperative. The study evaluates the efficacy, safety, and compliance of vonoprazan dual and triple therapy (VDT and VTT) both consisting of vonoprazan 20 mg twice daily and amoxicillin/clavulanate 875 mg/125 three times daily plus clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily added in VTT versus standard triple therapy (STT), in which vonoprazan 20 mg in VTT is replaced by PPI standard or double dose all for 14 days, along with investigating factors influencing compliance, treatment response, and symptoms severity. By per-protocol analysis, the eradication rates of the STT, VDT, and VTT groups were 70%, 76.2%, and 79.2%, respectively (p = 0.777) indicating suboptimal efficacy of the three treatment regimens. This necessitates the optimization of dosage and frequency of available treatment regimens as well as the development of new regimens with higher eradication rates. Interestingly, the VDT group demonstrated a better safety profile but with no statistically significant difference in cure rate. No difference in compliance with treatment was found between the groups. Gender, frequency of COVID-19 vaccination, height, and BMI were the only factors assessed influencing infection symptoms severity. ClinicalTrial.gov ID identifier: NCT05614934, first posted date (07/11/2022).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.