ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhanced hierarchical attention mechanism for mixed MIL in automatic Gleason grading and scoring.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Segmenting histological images and analyzing relevant regions are crucial for supporting pathologists in diagnosing various diseases. In prostate cancer diagnosis, Gleason grading and scoring relies on the recognition of different patterns in tissue samples. However, annotating large histological datasets is laborious, expensive, and often limited to slide-level or limited instance-level labels. To address this, we propose an enhanced hierarchical attention mechanism within a mixed multiple instance learning (MIL) model that effectively integrates slide-level and instance-level labels. Our hierarchical attention mechanism dynamically suppresses noisy instance-level labels while adaptively amplifying discriminative features, achieving a synergistic integration of global slide-level context and local superpixel patterns. This design significantly improves label utilization efficiency, leading to state-of-the-art performance in Gleason grading. Experimental results on the SICAPv2 and TMAs datasets demonstrate the superior performance of our model, achieving AUC scores of 0.9597 and 0.8889, respectively. Our work not only advances the state-of-the-art in Gleason grading but also highlights the potential of hierarchical attention mechanisms in mixed MIL models for medical image analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.