Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40341520›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Enhanced hierarchical attention mechanism for mixed MIL in automatic Gleason grading and scoring.

Meili Ren, Mengxing Huang, Yu Zhang, Zhijun Zhang, Meiyan Ren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meili RenHainan Provincial Key Laboratory of Big Data and Smart Service, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, China. renml@sxufe.edu.cn.
Mengxing HuangHainan Provincial Key Laboratory of Big Data and Smart Service, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, China.
Yu ZhangHainan Provincial Key Laboratory of Big Data and Smart Service, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, China.
Zhijun ZhangCenter of Network and Information Education Technology, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan, 030006, China.
Meiyan RenSchool of Medical, Shanxi Datong University, Datong, 037009, China.

Funding

Key Research and Development Project of Hainan Province ZDYF2021SHFZ243National Natural Science Foundation of China 82260362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segmenting histological images and analyzing relevant regions are crucial for supporting pathologists in diagnosing various diseases. In prostate cancer diagnosis, Gleason grading and scoring relies on the recognition of different patterns in tissue samples. However, annotating large histological datasets is laborious, expensive, and often limited to slide-level or limited instance-level labels. To address this, we propose an enhanced hierarchical attention mechanism within a mixed multiple instance learning (MIL) model that effectively integrates slide-level and instance-level labels. Our hierarchical attention mechanism dynamically suppresses noisy instance-level labels while adaptively amplifying discriminative features, achieving a synergistic integration of global slide-level context and local superpixel patterns. This design significantly improves label utilization efficiency, leading to state-of-the-art performance in Gleason grading. Experimental results on the SICAPv2 and TMAs datasets demonstrate the superior performance of our model, achieving AUC scores of 0.9597 and 0.8889, respectively. Our work not only advances the state-of-the-art in Gleason grading but also highlights the potential of hierarchical attention mechanisms in mixed MIL models for medical image analysis.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningNeoplasm GradingProstatic NeoplasmsAlgorithmsHumansMaleGleason gradingHierarchical attention mechanismMultiple instance learning

Identifiers

PMID40341520
PMCPMC12062252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.