ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative study on antibacterial activities and removal of iron ions from water using novel modified sand with silver through the hydrothermal technique.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The hydrothermal-calcination technique was used to modify raw sand with silver (Ag) at different weight percentages: 2%, 5%, and 10% using silver nitrate. The raw and sand-coated Ag nanoparticle samples were analyzed using various techniques, including scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis. The antibacterial properties of the raw and modified sand samples were evaluated using the zone of inhibition test and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) method. This study aims to determine the efficiency of sand-coated Ag nanoparticles in removing iron ions and bacteria, specifically Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), compared to raw sand. The results showed that the Ag content in the modified sand increased proportionally with the silver nitrate concentration. The modification of raw sand with 2% Ag nanoparticles resulted in a significant increase in surface area (85.78%), adsorption pore diameter (138%), and micropore volume (65.65%). The sand modified with 2% Ag exhibited a 31.29% higher removal efficiency and 14.6 mg/g greater adsorption capacity for iron ions than raw sand. A feed pH level between 4 and 10 was found to be optimal for iron removal efficiency (99.95%) using a 1.5 g/L sand-coated with 2% Ag. The maximum adsorption capacity of iron ions obtained in this study was 64 mg/g using sand-coated 2%Ag (dose = 0.2 g/L) at 24 °C in 4 h. Studies utilizing zone of inhibition and MIC methods revealed that the modified sand exhibits strong antibacterial properties against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains. In contrast, the raw sand shows no antibacterial activity. All sand-coated Ag nanoparticle samples achieved 100% growth inhibition at 72 µg/mL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.