ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025
A multi-model deep learning approach for the identification of coronary artery calcifications within 2D coronary angiography images.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of coronary calcium patterns on procedural outcomes in CTO-PCI: a computed tomography-based multicenter study.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Federated radiomics analysis of preoperative MRI across institutions: toward integrated glioma segmentation and molecular subtyping.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIdentifying and quantifying coronary artery calcification (CAC) is crucial for preoperative planning, as it helps to estimate both the complexity of the 2D coronary angiography (2DCA) procedure and the risk of developing intraoperative complications. Despite the relevance, the actual practice relies upon visual inspection of the 2DCA image frames by clinicians. This procedure is prone to inaccuracies due to the poor contrast and small size of the CAC; moreover, it is dependent on the physician's experience. To address this issue, we developed a workflow to assist clinicians in identifying CAC within 2DCA using data from 44 image acquisitions across 14 patients.
methodsOur workflow consists of three stages. In the first stage, a classification backbone based on ResNet-18 is applied to guide the CAC identification by extracting relevant features from 2DCA frames. In the second stage, a U-Net decoder architecture, mirroring the encoding structure of the ResNet-18, is employed to identify the regions of interest (ROI) of the CAC. Eventually, a post-processing step refines the results to obtain the final ROI. The workflow was evaluated using a leave-out cross-validation.
resultsThe proposed method outperformed the comparative methods by achieving an F1-score for the classification step of 0.87 (0.77
conclusionThis is the first attempt to propose a clinical decision support system to assist the identification of CAC within 2DCA. The proposed workflow holds the potential to improve both the accuracy and efficiency of CAC quantification, with promising clinical applications. As future work, the concurrent use of multiple auxiliary tasks could be explored to further improve the segmentation performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.