ArticleJournal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection2025
Treatment outcomes of a Swiss non-infectious paediatric uveitis cohort: retrospective study over ten years.
Article in Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ophthalmic manifestation of bilateral ocular toxocariasis: a case-series.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPaediatric uveitis treatment recommendations suggest a step-up treatment approach starting with topical treatment, followed by antimetabolites and thereafter biologics. With this study, we are investigating the safety and efficacy of the current treatment approach in a large cohort. MATERIAL AND
methodsSingle center retrospective study. Patients with non-infectious uveitis under the age of 18 years at first presentation, between January 2012 and June 2022, were eligible for inclusion. Data extracted from the electronic health records included age at first presentation, sex, involved eye segment, visual acuity (VA), complications, associated systemic disease, treatments, and number of consultations. Cases were grouped according to their final treatment regime (topical only, methotrexate, TNF alpha inhibitor, other). VA outcome, treatment response, adverse events, and frequency of consultations were evaluated. The study was approved by the local ethics committee.
results64 non-infectious paediatric uveitis cases were included. Age at first diagnosis ranged from 2 to 17 years, with a two-peak distribution, 52% were male. Anterior uveitis was the most common presentation, followed by intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, and panuveitis. Topical treatment achieved remission in 23%, anti-metabolites in 12%, and escalation to TNF alpha inhibitors in 30%. Alternative treatments or observation only were documented in 16% and 17%, respectively. Median duration from first presentation to the start of anti-metabolite or TNF alpha inhibitor were 115 days and 269 days, respectively. There was a median of eight consultations during the first year of follow up. Frequency of consultations during the first year increased with every treatment escalation. VA outcome did not differ between the different treatment groups.
conclusionThe step-up treatment approach shows a safe profile in regards to VA outcome. Methotrexate presents a high rate of treatment failure and adverse effects. Adalimumab and infliximab are effective and safe. Timely treatment escalation might lower treatment burden for affected children, their families, and health care providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.