ArticleScientific reports2025
Rapid cycle deliberate practice simulation with standardized prebriefing and video based formative feedback in advanced cardiac life support.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Undergraduate nursing students' perceptions, needs, and expectations regarding large language model-based virtual patients: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Simulation-based education in paramedic training: effects of perceived competence and practice frequency on clinical skills.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid-cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) is a training method involving brief, repetitive practice cycles with immediate feedback. This study examined the effectiveness of RCDP simulations in Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) training compared to traditional methods. A nonequivalent control group design was applied. Nursing students were divided into an experimental group (n = 30), which received Ludlow's standardized three-stage prebriefing, video-based formative feedback, repeated ACLS simulations, and debriefing, and a control group (n = 29) that had traditional ACLS simulation. Data collected from April 29 to June 5, 2024, were analyzed using SPSS/WIN 25.0. The results showed significant improvements in ACLS self-efficacy, knowledge, performance skills, and team communication in the experimental group compared to the control group. The findings suggest that RCDP simulation training, with its focus on repetition and immediate feedback, enhances practical skills and confidence in emergency resuscitation scenarios. This approach may be more effective than traditional simulation methods in medical education, particularly in improving clinical performance and patient outcomes. Beyond medical education, RCDP holds potential for clinical training by enhancing proficiency in high-stakes situations such as cardiac resuscitation. Continuous skill refinement through immediate correction in fast-paced environments can improve individual performance and team dynamics, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.