Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40341417›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Rapid cycle deliberate practice simulation with standardized prebriefing and video based formative feedback in advanced cardiac life support.

Kyungja Kang, Mi Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kyungja KangCollege of Nursing, Health and Nursing Research Institute, Jeju National University, 102 Jeju daehak-ro, Jeju, 63243, Republic of Korea.
Mi YuCollege of Nursing, Sustainable Health Research Institute, Gyeongsang National University, 816 Beongil-15, Jinju-daero, Jinju, 52727, Republic of Korea. yumi825@gnu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid-cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) is a training method involving brief, repetitive practice cycles with immediate feedback. This study examined the effectiveness of RCDP simulations in Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) training compared to traditional methods. A nonequivalent control group design was applied. Nursing students were divided into an experimental group (n = 30), which received Ludlow's standardized three-stage prebriefing, video-based formative feedback, repeated ACLS simulations, and debriefing, and a control group (n = 29) that had traditional ACLS simulation. Data collected from April 29 to June 5, 2024, were analyzed using SPSS/WIN 25.0. The results showed significant improvements in ACLS self-efficacy, knowledge, performance skills, and team communication in the experimental group compared to the control group. The findings suggest that RCDP simulation training, with its focus on repetition and immediate feedback, enhances practical skills and confidence in emergency resuscitation scenarios. This approach may be more effective than traditional simulation methods in medical education, particularly in improving clinical performance and patient outcomes. Beyond medical education, RCDP holds potential for clinical training by enhancing proficiency in high-stakes situations such as cardiac resuscitation. Continuous skill refinement through immediate correction in fast-paced environments can improve individual performance and team dynamics, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Advanced Cardiac Life SupportCardiopulmonary ResuscitationFormative FeedbackSimulation TrainingAdultClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansMaleSelf EfficacyStudents, NursingVideo RecordingYoung AdultAdvanced cardiac life supportFormative feedbackNursing studentsPrebriefingSimulation

Identifiers

PMID40341417
PMCPMC12062332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.