Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40341411›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2025

Eculizumab in severe pediatric STEC-HUS and its impact on neurological prognosis-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rachele Spagnol, Alessandra Alfisi, Marco Moi, Ilaria Bonvecchio, Nicola Bertazza Partigiani, Enrico Vidal

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachele SpagnolPediatric Nephrology Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy. rachele.spagnol@unipd.it.
Alessandra AlfisiPediatric Nephrology Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Marco MoiPediatric Nephrology Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Ilaria BonvecchioPediatric Nephrology Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Nicola Bertazza PartigianiPediatric Nephrology Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Enrico VidalPediatric Nephrology Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) is defined by the triad of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury (AKI) and is caused, in 90% of pediatric cases, by Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC-HUS) infection. While targeting complement component C5 using eculizumab has shown benefit in atypical HUS, its effect on STEC-HUS, especially on neurological outcome, remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of eculizumab on neurological prognosis in pediatric STEC-HUS. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024496489). A comprehensive literature search was performed in Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, clinicaltrial.gov, and grey literature sources up to February 28, 2025. Original studies involving pediatric patients (0-18 years) with STEC-HUS and neurological complications, treated with eculizumab, were eligible. Two independent reviewers screened studies and extracted data. Seven studies were included, totaling 529 patients, of whom 135 (25.5%) developed neurological complications. Among these, 44 patients (32.5%) had received eculizumab. Meta-analysis showed a higher likelihood of receiving eculizumab therapy in patients with neurological involvement compared to those without (OR 13.03, 95% CI 4.40-38.75). However, in patients with neurological involvement, no clinical benefit was observed compared to those treated with standard therapies (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.09-1.22, p = 0.10).

conclusionOur data did not demonstrate a significant improvement in neurological outcomes for STEC-HUS patients treated with eculizumab. Findings are limited by retrospective designs and potential confounding by indication; therefore, further studies are needed. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Neurological involvement is a major contributor to morbidity in HUS, particularly in STEC-associated forms. • Eculizumab is sometimes used off-label in severe cases, although its effectiveness in this setting remains uncertain. WHAT IS NEW: • This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis specifically addressing neurological prognosis in STEC-HUS. • Current evidence does not demonstrate a clear neurological benefit of eculizumab over standard therapy, highlighting the need for further studies.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedComplement Inactivating AgentsEscherichia coli InfectionsHemolytic-Uremic SyndromeNervous System DiseasesShiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coliAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantPrognosisAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedComplement Inactivating AgentseculizumabEculizumabNeurological involvementNeurological outcomeSTEC-HUS

Identifiers

PMID40341411
PMCPMC12062034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.