SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Eculizumab in severe pediatric STEC-HUS and its impact on neurological prognosis-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome in North-Eastern Germany During the STEC O45:H2 Outbreak in 2025: Clinical Features and Short-Term Outcomes.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Shiga toxin-centered pathophysiology defines the therapeutic limits of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli infection.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Risk of acute kidney injury following intravenous iodinated contrast exposure among pediatric population: a narrative review.Pediatric radiology · 2025Review
- Neurological Manifestations of Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review.Brain sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) is defined by the triad of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury (AKI) and is caused, in 90% of pediatric cases, by Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC-HUS) infection. While targeting complement component C5 using eculizumab has shown benefit in atypical HUS, its effect on STEC-HUS, especially on neurological outcome, remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of eculizumab on neurological prognosis in pediatric STEC-HUS. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024496489). A comprehensive literature search was performed in Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, clinicaltrial.gov, and grey literature sources up to February 28, 2025. Original studies involving pediatric patients (0-18 years) with STEC-HUS and neurological complications, treated with eculizumab, were eligible. Two independent reviewers screened studies and extracted data. Seven studies were included, totaling 529 patients, of whom 135 (25.5%) developed neurological complications. Among these, 44 patients (32.5%) had received eculizumab. Meta-analysis showed a higher likelihood of receiving eculizumab therapy in patients with neurological involvement compared to those without (OR 13.03, 95% CI 4.40-38.75). However, in patients with neurological involvement, no clinical benefit was observed compared to those treated with standard therapies (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.09-1.22, p = 0.10).
conclusionOur data did not demonstrate a significant improvement in neurological outcomes for STEC-HUS patients treated with eculizumab. Findings are limited by retrospective designs and potential confounding by indication; therefore, further studies are needed. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Neurological involvement is a major contributor to morbidity in HUS, particularly in STEC-associated forms. • Eculizumab is sometimes used off-label in severe cases, although its effectiveness in this setting remains uncertain. WHAT IS NEW: • This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis specifically addressing neurological prognosis in STEC-HUS. • Current evidence does not demonstrate a clear neurological benefit of eculizumab over standard therapy, highlighting the need for further studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.