ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning assisted noncontact neonatal anthropometry using FMCW radar.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study proposes a method for measuring the height and weight of a neonate conveniently, safely, and accurately by applying a convolutional neural network to frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) radar sensor data. Fifteen neonates, with parental consent, were enrolled in the study. The neonates were divided into two groups for analysis. Group 1, comprising ten neonates, was used for training and testing the machine learning model. The model achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.34 cm, a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.55 cm, and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.78 (p value < 0.001) in height measurements and an MAE of 0.23 kg, RMSE of 0.28 kg, and ICC of 0.85 (p value < 0.001) in weight measurements. Group 2 comprised five neonates and was used only to test the trained model. The model showed an MAE of 1.51 cm, RMSE of 1.70 cm, and ICC of 0.68 (p value < 0.001) in height measurements, alongside an MAE of 0.20 kg, RMSE of 0.25 kg, and ICC of 0.75 (p value < 0.001) in weight measurements. These results highlight the importance of FMCW radar-based measurements for continuous monitoring of neonatal growth and health, offering a convenient and practical solution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.