ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting high-need high-cost pediatric hospitalized patients in China based on machine learning methods.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Network Analysis-Driven Machine Learning Model for Identifying High-Cost Stroke Inpatients Using Hospital Discharge Data: Retrospective Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Development of machine learning and nomogram models to predict lung metastasis and prognosticate survival in breast cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Risk stratification and determinant identification of high-need, high-cost ICU patients using machine learning: a large-scale retrospective study from a multi-specialty ICU in a tertiary hospital.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Monitoring and Follow-Up of Patients on Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Therapy Using Artificial Intelligence: The AIto-Control Project.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapidly increasing healthcare spending globally is significantly driven by high-need, high-cost (HNHC) patients, who account for the top 5% of annual healthcare costs but over half of total expenditures. The programs targeting existing HNHC patients have shown limited long-term impact, and research predicting HNHC pediatric patients in China is limited. There is an urgent need to establish a specific, valid, and reliable prediction model using machine-learning-based methods to identify potential HNHC pediatric patients and implement proactive interventions before high costs arise. This study used a 7-year retrospective cohort dataset from two administrative databases in Shanghai, covering pediatric patients under 18 years. The machine-learning-based models were developed to predict HNHC status using logistic regression, k-nearest neighbors (KNN), random forest (RF), multi-layer perceptron (MLP), and Naive Bayes. This study divided the data from 2021-2022 into 70:30 as a training set and a test set, with the internal class balancing approach of the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE). A grid search strategy was employed with k-fold cross-validation to optimize hyperparameters. Model performance was assessed by 5 metrics: Receiver Operating Characteristic-Area Under Curve (ROC-AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score. The external validation from 2022-2023 data and the internal validation using different train-test ratios (80:20 and 90:10) were used to assess the robustness of the trained models. Among the 91,882 hospitalized children included in 2021, significant differences were found in socioeconomics, disease, healthcare service utilization, previous healthcare expenditure, and hospital characteristics between the HNHC and non-HNHC groups. The hospitalization costs for HNHC pediatric patients accounted for over 35% of total spending. The MLP model demonstrated the highest predictive performance (ROC-AUC: 0.872), followed by RF (0.869), KNN (0.836), and naive Bayes (0.828). The most important predictive factors included length of stay, number of hospitalizations, previous HNHC status, age, and presence of Top 20 HNHC diseases. MLP showed robustness as the most efficient model in external validation (ROC-AUC: 0.843) and internal validation using different train-test ratios (ROC-AUC: 0.826 in 80:20 ratio; 0.807 in 90:10 ratio). Machine learning models, particularly MLP, effectively predict HNHC pediatric patients, providing a basis for early identification of HNHC and proactive healthcare interventions into clinical practice. This approach can also assist policymakers and payers in optimizing healthcare resource allocation, controlling healthcare costs, and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.