ArticlePloS one2025
A conceptual and computational framework for modeling the complex, adaptive dynamics of epidemics: The case of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Mexico.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the quest to ensure adequate preparedness for health emergencies caused by infectious disease pandemics, there is a need for tools that can address the myriad relevant questions related to the spread and trajectory of pandemics. A hybrid intelligence model that combines human and artificial intelligence may provide a viable solution, as it can process data from models that comprehensively integrate contextual and direct factors, effectively mimicking the social processes surrounding transmission while incorporating human interpretation to enhance our understanding of pandemics. Using data from the COVID-19 pandemic, we demonstrate the implementation of this approach with the publically available EpI-PUMA (Epidemiological Intelligence Platform for the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México ("PUMA")) project and platforms, where a user may create their own hybrid intelligence Bayesian classifier models for a range of epidemiological indicators of interest. EPI-Puma integrates data from various public sources (including the national registry of SARS-CoV-2 cases, census data, poverty indicators, climate data and data related to atmospheric contaminants), enabling the deployment of models that predict a range of relevant outcomes. The main criteria for the data included was its coverage (at least at the municipality level) and availability (public data). EPI-Puma was able to identify both the differential predictive value of the different sets of factors related to the epidemic path and well as anticipate with a high probability the path of the pandemic (typical areas under the ROC curve for the associated classifiers being 0.8-0.9).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.