Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40341250›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2025

Predictive factors for neoadjuvant combined immunotherapy in gastric adenocarcinoma: Focusing on the primitive enterocyte phenotype and PVR.

Bingzhi Wang, Yinong Wang, Yongjian Zhu, Lei Guo, Hua Zeng, Shuai Wu, Long Wang, Jiali Mu, Xinxin Shao, Na Cheng and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Bingzhi Wang *Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Yinong Wang *State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Yongjian ZhuDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Lei GuoDepartment of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Hua ZengDepartment of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Shuai WuDepartment of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Long WangDepartment of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Jiali MuDepartment of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Xinxin ShaoDepartment of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Na ChengDepartment of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Jianming YingDepartment of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China. jmying@cicams.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7301-4118
Yantao TianDepartment of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China. tianyantao@cicams.ac.cn.
Liyan XueDepartment of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China. xuely@cicams.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5185-0126

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeoadjuvant combined immunotherapy has provided more treatment options for patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (GA). However, some GA patients, especially those with primitive enterocyte phenotype (GAPEP) show a poor response to immunotherapy, even with positive PD-L1 expression.

methodWe enrolled multiple cohorts from our center and utilized public data to identify the predictive factors and explore the immunosuppressive features of GAPEP by multi-omics methods.

resultsForty-seven patients with neoadjuvant combined immunotherapy were enrolled. After testing, we found PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 50 in biopsy tissues was significantly associated with major pathological response (MPR) (P = 0.04). RNA testing and immunohistochemical staining highlighted the cytotoxicity-associated markers (GZMA and PRF1) as the predictors to better response. Notably, GAPEP patients demonstrated resistance to therapy and exhibited worse survival outcomes. Our own and public bulk/single-cell transcriptomic analyses identified PVR as a predictor of treatment resistance and as an important immune suppressor, especially in GAPEP. Cell interaction analyses, multiple staining, and cell experiments verified the association between GAPEP and PVR.

conclusionCytotoxic markers, especially GZMA and PRF1, could predict the benefit of neoadjuvant combined immunotherapy in GA than PD-L1 CPS, while PVR is a negative predictor, particularly for GAPEP patients.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaImmunotherapyStomach NeoplasmsAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPhenotypePrognosisB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD274 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID40341250
PMCPMC12304217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.