Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40341247›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Prediction of the functional outcome of intensive inpatient rehabilitation after stroke using machine learning methods.

Silvia Campagnini, Alessandro Sodero, Marco Baccini, Bahia Hakiki, Antonello Grippo, Claudio Macchi, Andrea Mannini, Francesca Cecchi

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03866057 unknown statusnot on this map

Post Stroke Intensive Rehabilitation: Predictors of Outcome and Response to Specific Interventions

TypeobservationalSponsorFondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETSRan2019 to 2020Enrolled270ConditionsStroke Rehabilitation
NCT05389878 recruitingnot on this map

STroke RehabilitATion rEgistrY for Predicting Functional Outcomes

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETSRan2022 to 2026Enrolled600ConditionsStrokeArmsrehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Silvia CampagniniIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi onlus, Via di Scandicci 269, Firenze, 50143, Italy.
Alessandro SoderoIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi onlus, Via di Scandicci 269, Firenze, 50143, Italy.
Marco BacciniIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi onlus, Via di Scandicci 269, Firenze, 50143, Italy.
Bahia HakikiIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi onlus, Via di Scandicci 269, Firenze, 50143, Italy.
Antonello GrippoIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi onlus, Via di Scandicci 269, Firenze, 50143, Italy.
Claudio MacchiIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi onlus, Via di Scandicci 269, Firenze, 50143, Italy.
Andrea ManniniIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi onlus, Via di Scandicci 269, Firenze, 50143, Italy. amannini@dongnocchi.it.
Francesca CecchiIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi onlus, Via di Scandicci 269, Firenze, 50143, Italy.

Funding

Ministero della Salute Ricerca Corrente
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An accurate and reliable functional prognosis is vital to stroke patients addressing rehabilitation, to their families, and healthcare providers. This study aimed at developing and validating externally patient-wise prognostic models of the global functional outcome at discharge from intensive inpatient post-acute rehabilitation after stroke, based on a standardized comprehensive multidimensional assessment performed at admission to rehabilitation. Patients addressing intensive inpatient rehabilitation pathways within 30 days from stroke were prospectively enrolled in two consecutive multisite studies. Demographics, description of the event, clinical/functional, and psycho-social data were collected. The outcome of interest was disability in basic daily living activities at discharge, measured by the modified Barthel Index (mBI). Machine learning-based prognostic models were developed, internally cross-validated, and externally validated. Interpretability techniques were applied for the analysis of predictors. 385 patients were considered, 220 (165) for training (external test) sets. A 50.9% (55.8%) of women, 79.5% (80.0%) of ischemic, and a median [interquartile range- IQR] age of 80.0[15.0] (79.0[17.0]) were registered. The Support Vector Machine obtained the best validation performances and a median absolute error [IQR] on discharge mBI estimation of 11.5[15.0] and 9.2[13.0] points on the internal and external testing, respectively. The baseline variables providing the main contributions to the predictions were mBI, motor upper-limb score, age, and cognitive screening score. We achieved a solution to support the formulation of a functional prognosis at intensive rehabilitation admission. The interpretability analysis confirms the relevance of easily collected motor and cognitive dataat admission and of the patient's age.Trial registration: Prospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (registration numbers RIPS NCT03866057, STRATEGY NCT05389878).

Indexed as

Machine LearningStrokeStroke RehabilitationActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesRecovery of FunctionSupport Vector MachineTreatment OutcomeCross-validationExternal validationFunctional outcomeMachine learningModified Barthel indexPredictive modelRehabilitationStroke

Identifiers

PMID40341247
PMCPMC12062331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.