ArticleJournal of human genetics2025
Refining the detection of complex rearrangements in 15q15.3 region involving the STRC gene in hereditary hearing loss patients.
Article in Journal of human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- VACmap: an accurate long-read aligner for unraveling complex genomic rearrangements.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hearing loss (HL) is the most common sensory disability worldwide, with GJB2-GJB6 connexin alterations (DFNB1) being the most frequent causes of non-syndromic hearing loss (NSHL). Recent studies have also highlighted the STRC gene as a significant contributor to NSHL, with its incidence potentially approaching that of connexin alterations. Despite advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS), molecular diagnosis remains challenging for many NSHL patients, often due to the complexity of analyzing the STRC gene. This is largely attributed to its location in a tandemly duplicated region and the presence of a homologous pseudogene (STRCP1), which complicates its accurate identification. The most common cause of DFNB16 is a homozygous large contiguous gene deletion at 15q15.3, but other copy number variants (CNVs), including both losses and gains, have been less well characterized. Through a combination of techniques we present new data on STRC variants and the diagnosis of 72 DFNB16 patients from 59 families. While the CKMT1B-STRC-CATSPER2 deletion is the most frequent alteration, the improvement of droplet-digital PCR (ddPCR) for refining CNV analysis in the first 16 exons of the gene (99,8% homologous with the pseudogene) has allowed us to identify and better define a higher incidence of previously unclarified complex rearrangements. Additionally, we have identified a direct cis association between the c.4837 G > T;p.(Glu1613*) pathogenic variant and the CATSPER2-CKMT1A-STRCP1 duplication. These findings underscore the important role of ddPCR in identifying CNVs that are difficult to detect through conventional NGS, significantly improving diagnosis and enabling precise genetic counseling for affected families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40341240What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.