ArticleScientific reports2025
Performance analysis of an indoor visible light communication system using LED configurations and diverse photodetectors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Second-level fast sintering enables high-brightness light source for visible light communication.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Impact of a textile layer on joint optical data and power transfer to in-body devices: a study on an ex vivo approach.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Study on Visible Light Communication Systems Based on OLED Devices.Micromachines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates the implementation and performance of a Visible Light Communication (VLC) system designed to transmit text data between two personal computers (PCs). The proposed system utilizes three distinct light-emitting diode (LED) -Single LED, 2 × 2 LED Array, and 4 × 4 LED Array-as transmitters and three types of photodetectors-BPW34 photodiode, solar cell, and light-dependent resistor (LDR)-as receivers. Controlled by an Arduino, the system investigates the relationships between data rate, transmission distance, beam angle, LED configurations, and detector types. Experimental results confirmed that the BPW34 photodiode outperformed the solar cell and LDR in terms of maximum achievable data rate and transmission distance, consistent with its superior bandwidth and sensitivity characteristics. The findings also reveal that, at a zero-degree beam angle, the system employing the BPW34 photodiode achieved a maximum transmission distance of 9.15 m at 1 kilobit per second (kbps) with a single LED configuration, diminishing to 1.24 m at 4 kbps. The 2 × 2 LED array extended the distance 14.20 m at 1 kbps and 2.30 m at 4 kbps. Conversely, the 4 × 4 LED array exhibited the most extensive propagation distances, achieving 16.30 m at 1 kbps and maintaining 3.25 m at 4 kbps. These findings underscore the efficacy of increasing LED array size in enhancing propagation distance, particularly at lower data rates. The study highlights the potential of VLC systems for efficient indoor optical communication, providing valuable insights for optimizing LED configurations and receiver technologies in future applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.