ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning-based predictive modelling of mental health in Rwandan Youth.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Globally, mental disorders are a significant burden, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, with high prevalence in Rwanda, especially among survivors of the 1994 genocide against Tutsi. Machine learning offers promise in predicting mental health outcomes by identifying patterns missed by traditional methods. However, its application in Rwanda remains under-explored. The study aims to apply machine learning techniques to predict mental health and identify its associated risk factors among Rwandan youth. Mental health data from Rwanda Biomedical Center, collected through the recent Rwanda mental health cross-sectional study and with youth sample of 5221 was used. We used four machine learning models namely logistic regression, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest and Gradient boosting to predict mental health vulnerability among youth. The research findings indicate that the random forest model is the most effective with an accuracy of 88.8% in modeling and predicting factors contributing to mental health vulnerability and 75 % in predicting mental disorders comorbidity. Exposure to traumatic events and violence, heavy drinking and a family history of mental health emerged as the most significant risk factors contributing to the development of mental disorders. While trauma experience, violence experience, affiliation to pro-social group and family history of mental disorders are the main comorbidity drivers. These findings indicate that machine learning can provide insightful results in predicting factors associated with mental health and confirm the role of social and biological factors in mental health. Therefore, it is crucial to consider biological and social factors particularly experience of violence and exposure to traumatic events, when developing mental health interventions and policies in Rwanda. Potential initiatives should prioritize the youth who experience social hardship to strengthen intervention efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.