Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40341185›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Preliminary results of lateral interaction and radial deformity hyperacuity in children with glaucoma.

Christiane Rolim-de-Moura, Carolina P B Gracitelli, Otavio Correa Pinho, Marcelo Fernandes da Costa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christiane Rolim-de-MouraVision Laboratory, Psychology Institute, University of São Paulo, 1721 Professor Mello Moraes, 05508-030, São Paulo, Brazil. chrm@terra.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0636-8100
Carolina P B GracitelliDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Otavio Correa PinhoVision Laboratory, Psychology Institute, University of São Paulo, 1721 Professor Mello Moraes, 05508-030, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelo Fernandes da CostaVision Laboratory, Psychology Institute, University of São Paulo, 1721 Professor Mello Moraes, 05508-030, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo - FAPESP 2014/26818-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess lateral spatial interaction (LSI) and radial deformity hyperacuity (RDH) in children with glaucoma and compare them with a normal control group. A cross-sectional study was conducted on both eyes of 16 participants (8 children with glaucoma and 10 age-matched control). LSI and RDH were collected in the same day. Children with glaucoma exhibited a lower interaction effect (F = 4.48; p = 0.035) compared to age-matched control children. Differences were observed in measurement conditions with and without flanks, except for frequency 0.8 cpd. Additionally, radial deformation hyperacuity thresholds were significantly higher for all stimulus conditions in children with glaucoma compared to controls: 5-point distortion (0.125 cpg F = 8.27, p = 0.007; 0.5 cpg F = 14.72, p < 0.001), 10-point distortion (0.125 cpg F = 8.15, p = 0.007; 0.5 cpg F = 8.15, p = 0.026), and 15-point distortion (0.125 cpg F = 5.92, p = 0.020; 0.5 cpg F = 9.98, p = 0.003). Children with glaucoma demonstrated a reduced spatial contrast interaction and higher radial deformation hyperacuity thresholds, indicating decreased information input to higher visual areas.

Indexed as

GlaucomaVisual AcuityAdolescentCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleChildCongenital glaucomaGlaucomaLateral interactionRadial deformity threshold

Identifiers

PMID40341185
PMCPMC12062326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.