ArticleBMJ open2025
Generational diversity among postgraduate doctors in training in the NHS: protocol for a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06446297 (Investigating the Experiences of Generational Diversity Within the Medical Profession of the National Health Service), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Investigating the Experiences of Generational Diversity Within the Medical Profession of the National Health Service: An Exploratory Study Amongst Post-Graduate Doctors in Training
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gender and Perceived Racial Diversity in Academic Otolaryngology.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- Exploring the use of gender-inclusive language amongst health care students and staff in obstetrics and gynaecology.Medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe concept of generations and generational diversity in the workplace is a widely discussed phenomenon in popular culture, organisational articles and research studies. A number of non-medical and medical organisations have attempted to identify generational differences among their workforces and devise solutions to overcome this. The impact of generational differences among the medical workforce, specifically postgraduate doctors-in-training (PGDiTs), in the National Health Service (NHS) has not been studied. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: This qualitative study will use a pragmatic study methodology with components of grounded theory and interpretative phenomenological analysis to explore and understand the concept, perceptions, experiences and sources of generational diversity among PGDiTs working in the NHS. Six focus groups will be conducted with PGDiTs recruited from a single acute NHS Trust. Participants will be stratified according to their generation (ie, Generation X, Y or Z). Two focus groups will be conducted for each generation. If insufficient participants are recruited for a focus group, then one-to-one interviews will be offered. The data from the focus groups and one-to-one interviews will be analysed using an inductive thematic analysis method using NVivo software. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received approval from the Health Research Authority and Care Research Wales (Reference: 24/HRA/0770). Ethics committee approval is not required as the study involves NHS staff as research participants. The findings from this study will report a number of higher level themes reflecting the views and experiences of the research participants. The findings will be disseminated via academic conferences and peer-reviewed publications.NCT06446297.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.