Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40341146›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

ASPirin for Acute Pneumonia in the elderlY (ASPAPY): protocol of a multicentre randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

Alain Putot, Patrick Manckoundia, Eléa Ksiazek, Marion Cortier, Amelie Cransac, Isabelle Fournel, ASPAPY study group

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. [Interpretation and Examples: Key Updates in SPIRIT 2025 Statement].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alain PutotInfectious Disease and Internal Medicine Department, Hôpitaux du Pays du Mont-Blanc, Sallanches, France a.putot@ch-sallanches-chamonix.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4408-554X
Patrick ManckoundiaGeriatric Internal Medicine Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Eléa KsiazekClinical Epidemiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Marion CortierDirection of Clinical Research and Innovation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Amelie CransacPharmacy, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon, France.
Isabelle FournelClinical Epidemiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
ASPAPY study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcute pneumonia (AP) remains a leading cause of death in the older population. Excess risk of death after AP is partly due to cardiovascular (CV) events. We aim to evaluate whether aspirin at a preventive dose (100 mg daily) introduced at the acute phase of AP reduces 90-day mortality. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The ASPirin for Acute Pneumonia in the elderlY study is a phase III multicentre randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority clinical trial, which will investigate the efficacy and safety of aspirin in older patients with AP hospitalised in a French university and non-university hospitals. Patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio between two groups receiving daily either 100 mg of aspirin or a placebo, within 84 hours following radiologically proven AP diagnosis for 90 days. This study aimed at assessing the efficacy of aspirin on all-cause mortality after AP at 90 days (D90) (primary objective), D30 and D120 after randomisation, CV mortality, major adverse CV events (MACE) (ie, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, new atrial fibrillation and pulmonary embolism, CV death and sudden death) incidence, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, unscheduled rehospitalisation, dependence, overall and MACE-free survival, as well as safety outcomes (bleeding incidence). The sample size, calculated considering a 90-day mortality of 25% and a reduction of 10% in the aspirin group, a two-sided alpha risk at 5% and power of 80%, is 500 patients to prove the superiority of aspirin over placebo. To account for screening failures and consent withdrawals, 600 patients (300 per arm) will be included. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has full approval from an independent Ethics Committee. Participants will sign a written informed consent ahead of participation. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EU CTIS: 2024-510811-32-00.

Indexed as

AspirinPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPneumoniaAcute DiseaseAgedAged, 80 and overCardiovascular DiseasesClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDouble-Blind MethodEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleFranceHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAspirinPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsAgedCardiovascular DiseaseMortalityRandomized Controlled TrialRespiratory infections

Identifiers

PMID40341146
PMCPMC12060875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.