ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2025
Comparative Review of Lateral and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique, Outcomes, and Complications.
Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional Ureteral Obstruction Due to Retroperitoneal Tissue Interposition During Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Report of Two Cases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Mid-term effects of posterior versus oblique lumbar interbody fusion on spinopelvic alignment and clinical outcomes in lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective comparative cohort study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Global research landscape and citation dynamics of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF): A bibliometric analysis of the 100 most influential articles.Brain & spine · 2026Review
- Influence of psoas major morphology on clinical outcomes following L4-5 oblique lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective study of 191 patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- An ingenious 3D-printed navigating template for accurate screw placement in lumbar spinal stenosis.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimally invasive spinal surgery has made tremendous progress. The retroperitoneal lateral lumbar interbody fusion and oblique lumbar interbody fusion techniques are increasingly used to treat a variety of lumbar spinal conditions. As with other minimally invasive techniques, the theoretical advantages include reduced blood loss, improved postoperative pain due to less retraction and smaller incisions, faster recovery, and eliminating the need for an approach surgeon. It allows the placement of a large cage that spans the apophyses and enables the achievement of indirect decompression as well as coronal and sagittal deformity correction. As experience grows and the techniques evolve further, indications might be expanded beyond their current limitations. However, as these techniques continue to grow in popularity, evidence-based risk-stratification systems are required. This study reviews the literature about the development and application of lateral lumbar interbody fusion and oblique lumbar interbody fusion, with a discussion of its outcomes, approach-related complications specific to the lateral technique, and areas of new research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.