Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40341100›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2025

Physiological comparison of noninvasive ventilation and high-flow nasal oxygen on inspiratory efforts and tidal volumes after extubation: a randomized crossover trial.

François Arrive, Sylvain Le Pape, Alejandro Bruhn, Adrien Pépin Lehalleur, Clément Beuvon, Samuel Tuffet, Erik Etien, Laurent Rambault, Jean-Pierre Frat, Rémi Coudroy and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04036175 (Comparison of Patient Work of Breathing and Tidal Volumes With High-flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy and Non-invasive Ventilation After Extubation in the ICU), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04036175 naunknown statusnot on this map

Comparison of Patient Work of Breathing and Tidal Volumes With High-flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy and Non-invasive Ventilation After Extubation in the ICU: a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorPoitiers University HospitalRan2018 to 2020Enrolled25ConditionsICU, Extubation, Non-invasive Ventilation, High-Flow Nasal Oxygen TherapyArmsHigh-Flow Nasal Oxygen / Non-invasive ventilation / Standard oxygen
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

François ArriveService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France. francois.arrive@chu-poitiers.fr.
Sylvain Le PapeService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Alejandro BruhnDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Adrien Pépin LehalleurService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Clément BeuvonService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Samuel TuffetService de Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Saint Joseph Saint Luc, Lyon, France.
Erik EtienISAE-ENSMA Poitiers, LIAS, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Laurent RambaultISAE-ENSMA Poitiers, LIAS, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Jean-Pierre FratService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Rémi CoudroyService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Arnaud W ThilleService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtubation failure leading to reintubation is associated with high mortality. In patients at high-risk of extubation failure, clinical practice guidelines recommend prophylactic non-invasive ventilation (NIV) over high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) immediately after extubation. However, the physiological effects supporting the beneficial effect of NIV have been poorly explored. We hypothesized that NIV may reduce patient inspiratory efforts to a greater extent than HFNO after extubation.

methodsIn a prospective physiological study, patients at high-risk of extubation failure (> 65 years old or underlying cardiac or respiratory disease) were included to receive after planned extubation prophylactic NIV and HFNO in a randomized crossover order, followed by standard oxygen. Inspiratory efforts were assessed by calculation of the simplified esophageal pressure-time-product per minute (sPTP

resultsTwenty patients were retained in the analysis. Inspiratory efforts were lower with NIV than with HFNO (sPTP

conclusionsIn patients at high-risk of extubation failure, prophylactic NIV significantly decreased inspiratory efforts with increased tidal volumes compared to HFNO. The clinical benefits of NIV to prevent reintubation in patients at high-risk may be mediated by these physiological effects. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov: ID NCT04036175), retrospectively registered 17 June 2019.

Indexed as

Airway ExtubationNoninvasive VentilationOxygen Inhalation TherapyTidal VolumeAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesVentilator WeaningAirway extubationNoninvasive ventilationVentilator weaningWork of breathing

Identifiers

PMID40341100
PMCPMC12060563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.