ArticleJournal of global health2025
Assessing the joint effects of education, economic status, empowerment, and employment (4Es) disparities on the co-coverage of maternal, newborn and child health care services in sub-Saharan Africa: an application of the intersectionality approach.
Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although education, employment, economic status, and empowerment (4Es) are known to individually influence inequalities in maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH), their combined effects have not been thoroughly studied in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). We applied an intersectional approach to understand the joint effect of the 4Es on MNCH co-coverage in different settings in SSA. Methods: We used 25 Demographic and Health Survey data sets and employed a multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy to assess the intersectional effects of the 4Es on MNCH service co-coverage and inequalities within and across countries. The variance partition coefficient and proportional change in variance (PCV) statistics were applied to quantify total intersectional effects. Results: Among 103 388 women with children aged 12-59 months, 4.6% of the variance in co-coverage of ≥6 MNCH interventions (co-coverage ≥6) occurred at the intersectional strata level. Most of this variance (90.3%) was due to the additive effects of the 4Es, with education (PCV partial = 80.7%) the primary contributor, followed by economic status (PCV partial = 9.8%). The lowest co-coverage was observed among women with no education, unemployment, low economic status, and low empowerment. Inequalities were more pronounced in countries with lower universal health coverage (UHC) indices, where co-coverage ranged from 17.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 14.6-21.1) to 67.0% (95% CI = 62.9-70.8), compared with 42.8% (95% CI = 38.0-47.8) to 68.5% (95% CI = 64.7-71.8) in countries with higher UHC indices. Evidence of multiplicative effects was also observed. Services with a high disparity included skilled birth attendance, antenatal care, and access to improved water sources. Country-specific analysis revealed that 11 countries showed very low heterogeneity (<5%) in the co-coverage of ≥6 interventions. Conclusions: This is the first study to explore how the 4Es jointly affect MNCH co-coverage in SSA. The results reveal that these 4Es are connected and affect MNCH co-coverage, particularly in key services, including skilled birth attendance, antenatal care, and access to improved water sources. The most privileged groups had significant protective effects, whereas those with fewer societal privileges showed minor effects. Learning from countries with low disparities in service co-coverage can help reduce the gaps in other countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.