Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40341055›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2025

The published role of artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development: a bibliometric and social network analysis from 1990 to 2023.

Murat Koçak, Zafer Akçalı

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Murat KoçakFaculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Informatics, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey. muratkocak25@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6510-3666
Zafer AkçalıFaculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Informatics, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2473-4431

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Today, drug discovery and development is one of the fields where Artificial Intelligence (AI) is used extensively. Therefore, this study aims to systematically analyze the scientific literature on the application of AI in drug discovery and development to understand the evolution, trends, and key contributors within this rapidly growing field. By leveraging various bibliometric indicators and visualization techniques, we seek to explore the growth patterns, influential authors and institutions, collaboration networks, and emerging research trends within this domain. Bibliometric and network analysis methods (co-occurrence, co-authorship, and collaboration, etc.) were used to achieve this goal. Bibliometric visualization tools such as Bibliometrix R package software, VOSviewer, and Litmaps were used for comprehensive data analysis. Scientific publications on AI in drug discovery and development were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS CC) database covering 1990-2023. In addition to visualization programs, the InCites database was also used for analysis and visualization. A total of 4059 scientific publications written by 13,932 authors and published in 1071 journals were included in the analysis. The results reveal that the most prolific authors are Ekins (n = 67), Schneider (n = 52), Hou Tj (n = 43), and Cao Ds (n = 34), while the most active institutions are the "Chinese Academy of Science" and "University of California." The leading scientific journals are "Journal of Chemical Information and Modelling," "Briefings in Bioinformatics," and "Journal of Cheminformatics." The most frequently used author keywords include "protein folding," "QSAR," "gene expression data," "coronavirus," and "genome rearrangement." The average number of citations per scientific publication is 28.62, indicating a high impact of research in this field. A significant increase in publications was observed after 2014, with a peak in 2022, followed by a slight decline. International collaboration accounts for 28.06% of the publications, with the USA and China leading in both productivity and influence. The study also identifies key funding organizations, such as the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) and the United States Department of Health & Human Services, which have significantly supported advancements in this field. In conclusion, this study highlights the transformative role of AI in drug discovery and development, showcasing its potential to accelerate innovation and improve efficiency. The findings provide valuable insights into the current state of research, emerging trends, and future directions, offering a roadmap for researchers, industry professionals, and policymakers to further explore and leverage AI technologies in this domain.Scientific contributionThis study provides a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of 4,059 scientific publications (1990-2023) to map the evolution, trends, and key contributors in AI-driven drug discovery, identifying prolific authors (e.g., Ekins, Schneider), leading institutions (e.g., Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of California), and high-impact journals (Journal of Chemical Information and Modelling). It reveals critical collaboration patterns (28.06% international co-authorships), dominant funding sources (e.g., NSFC, NIH), and emerging research hotspots (e.g., protein folding, QSAR, coronavirus), while highlighting the transformative role of deep learning post-2014. By synthesizing these insights, the study offers a strategic roadmap for researchers and policymakers to optimize AI applications in drug development, addressing both current challenges and future opportunities in the field.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligence (AI)Bibliometric analysisDrug developmentDrug discoveryNetwork analysisScientific publications

Identifiers

PMID40341055
PMCPMC12063294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.