Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40341034›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

A Human Motion Data Capture Study The University of Liverpool Rehabilitation Exercise Dataset.

Nikhil Reji, Kristiaan D'Août, Sebastiano Fichera, Paolo Paoletti

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nikhil RejiSchool of Engineering, University of Liverpool, L69 3GH, Liverpool, UK. sgnreji@liverpool.ac.uk.
Kristiaan D'AoûtInstitute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, L7 8TX, Liverpool, UK.
Sebastiano FicheraSchool of Engineering, University of Liverpool, L69 3GH, Liverpool, UK.
Paolo PaolettiSchool of Engineering, University of Liverpool, L69 3GH, Liverpool, UK. paoletti@liverpool.ac.uk.

Funding

RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/R513271/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing accessibility of motion tracking technologies has resulted in a large amount of research focused on delivering exercise-based interventions remotely, coined under the term telerehabilitation. High quality human motion data is an essential component in the development and evaluation of Human Action Recognition (HAR) research, which plays a large role in exercise-based telerehabilitation. However, there is a lack of such human motion datasets for this domain, which hinders fast progress. This work presents a new human motion dataset named University of Liverpool Rehabilitation Exercise Dataset (UL-RED) containing 22 non-specialised exercises across 10 subjects and three data modalities: marker-based and marker-less motion tracking, and depth data. This dataset is the first to include motion repetitions of varying motion speeds, where subjects performed repetitions at a normal, fast, and slow pace. A total of 1,320 recordings were collected across the three data modalities, with over three hours of marker-based and marker-less motion tracking. This dataset is not only useful in the telerehabilitation landscape, but also within the wider field of HAR.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyHumansMovementTelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID40341034
PMCPMC12062305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.