Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40341032›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025

PD-1 blockade employed at the time CD8+ T cells are activated enhances their antitumor efficacy.

Jena E Moseman, Ichwaku Rastogi, Donghwan Jeon, Douglas G McNeel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Circadian clock and cancer.Military Medical Research · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. NFATC3 enhances osteosarcoma progression by increasing PD-L1 and CXCL2 levels.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jena E MosemanUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6849-3225
Ichwaku RastogiUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1957-1164
Donghwan JeonUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Douglas G McNeelUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA dm3@medicine.wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1471-6723

Funding

University of Wisconsin Prostate SPOREP50CA269011 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DAVID F. JARRARD, DOUGLAS G. MCNEEL · 2023 to 2026
$10.6M
Training in Cancer Biology Training GrantT32CA009135 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SUGDEN, WILLIAM M. · 1985 to 2024
$10.4M
Effective Anti-Tumor Vaccination - Targeting Checkpoint Regulation at the Time of T-cell ActivationR01CA219154 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MCNEEL, DOUGLAS G. · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA269011NCI NIH HHS R01 CA219154NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe have previously shown that immune checkpoint receptors, including PD-1, are upregulated on T cells at the time of their activation, and that blockade of these receptors can improve the efficacy of antitumor vaccines. In the present study, we sought to determine whether, and by what mechanisms, the timing of PD-1 blockade with respect to vaccination affects antitumor T cell function.

methodsTRAMP-C1 or E.G7-OVA tumor-bearing mice received PD-1 blockade at different timing intervals with a tumor-associated antigen vaccine. Tumor growth, survival, and immune-infiltrating populations were assessed. In vitro models of T cell activation using OT-I T cells and PD-(L)1 axis disruption with a PD-1 blocking antibody or PD-L1

resultsMice receiving PD-1 blockade at the time of T cell activation with vaccine had better antitumor outcomes in comparison to mice receiving PD-1 blockade before or after immunization. T cells activated in vitro in the presence of PD-(L)1 axis disruption had a more differentiated, functional phenotype with decreased CD28 and CCR7 expression and increased production of the Tc1 cytokines IL-2, TNFα, and IFNγ. Intriguingly, a small subset of undifferentiated cells (CD28+) was of a stem-like Tc17 phenotype (IL-17α+, TCF1+). Tumor-bearing mice receiving T cells activated in the presence of PD-(L)1-axis disruption had better antitumor outcomes and a greater number of complete responses.

conclusionsThese data indicate that PD-1 blockade, when used with antitumor vaccines, acts primarily at the time of T cell activation, not exclusively within the tumor microenvironment. Consequently, PD-1 blockade may be best used when delivered concurrently with T cell activating agents such as vaccines.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorAnimalsFemaleLymphocyte ActivationMiceMice, Inbred C57BLCancer VaccinesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsPdcd1 protein, mouseProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorDendritic CellsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorImmunotherapyT cellVaccine

Identifiers

PMID40341032
PMCPMC12067779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.