ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
Differences in backcourt forehand clear stroke between novice players and experienced badminton players: based on body segment acceleration data.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gaze behaviors during forehand clear and backhand driving in badminton: a comparison between beginner, intermediate and expert players.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Energy-Expenditure Estimation During Aerobic Training Sessions for Badminton Players.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Mechanical asymmetries in gastrocnemius stiffness: shear-wave elastography insights into the biomechanics and injury susceptibility of calf muscle strain injuries.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBackcourt forehand clear stroke is a fundamental technique in badminton, but the biomechanical differences between novice and experienced players are not fully understood. This study aimed to compare the kinematic characteristics of body segment acceleration during the backcourt forehand clear stroke between these two groups.
methodsForty-five participants (22 novice players with less than 2 years of experience and 23 experienced players with over 5 years of competitive experience) were placed with wireless accelerometers on key body segments (foot, calf, thigh, hip, shoulder, upper arm, forearm). Each participant performed 5 backcourt forehand clear strokes, and acceleration data were collected at 100 Hz. The mean values from the 5 repetitions were used for statistical analysis to ensure reliability and reduce variability.
resultsThe results revealed significant differences in movement patterns between the groups. Novices exhibited greater ranges of motion (ROMs) in most body segments, particularly at the hip, thigh, calf, and shoulder, across the x, y, and z axes (p < 0.05). Additionally, novices showed higher maximum and minimum accelerations (p < 0.05).
conclusionThese findings suggest that experienced players achieve more efficient movement patterns through refined motor control and reduced excessive motion. This research provides valuable insights for coaching interventions and technique refinement in badminton training programs, particularly for developing players.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.