ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Recovery colleges as enablers of personal recovery: qualitative evaluation of the development of a recovery college in the Netherlands.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of Recovery Colleges: A Nonrandomised Clinical Trial Across Two Years Using Propensity Score Matching: Efficacité des collèges de rétablissement: essai clinique non randomisé sur deux ans utilisant l'appariement par score de propension.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2026Observational
- Inside or Outside? A Qualitative Comparative Study of 2 Recovery Colleges in Sweden and Norway.Journal of participatory medicine · 2026Article
- Discovery colleges in youth mental health systems: developmentally adapted recovery-oriented learning environments.International journal of mental health systems · 2026Review
- Recovery Colleges or Something Different? The Development and Evaluation of a Reflection Tool for Recovery Colleges in the Netherlands.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the Netherlands, maintaining high standards of mental healthcare faces challenges due to an increasing demand for mental healthcare and a focus on symptomatic recovery rather than personal growth and improvement in the quality of life. Recovery colleges, which emphasize personal recovery through hope, autonomy, and empowerment, offer a transformative approach by fostering an environment where individuals with mental distress can learn and thrive. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of students and relevant stakeholders (like family members or regional social workers) with the recovery college.
methodsThis study evaluated the experiences of students working on their personal recovery at the Recovery College Venlo, by utilizing qualitative methods including focus group interviews, personal interviews and thematic analyses.
resultsThe participants reported benefits such as enhanced personal growth and a reduction in self-stigma and reliance on traditional mental health services. Peer workers with lived experience were reported to play a pivotal role in facilitating recovery. Although recovery colleges show promise in supporting personal recovery and providing cost-effective alternatives to conventional mental health services, challenges remain in increasing awareness, accessibility, and family involvement. Further research is needed to optimize the implementation of recovery colleges and fully understand their effectiveness.
conclusionsThe study underscores the importance of co-creation in the development of recovery-oriented services, and highlights areas for improvement, including enhanced family support and more streamlined access for potential students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.