ArticleBMC public health2025
Screening for coercive control with refugee women accessing settlement services.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCoercive control is gaining increasing recognition as a form of intimate partner violence (IPV). Refugee women in countries of settlement are vulnerable to experiencing controlling behaviour. Interventions that support identification of controlling behaviour are an important step in enabling help-seeking for refugee women and prevention of further violence.
methodsThe Safety and Health After Arrival (SAHAR) study tested a culturally tailored IPV screening and response strategy for refugee women accessing Australian settlement services. All women accessing the study sites were asked about controlling behaviours using the ACTS screening tool, which also asks about actions causing fear, threats, and physical abuse. Findings reported here include consultations with a lived experience panel and services, screening results, focus group data and manager interviews.
resultsOf 312 women asked the ACTS questions by caseworkers in four settlement services, 90 women (29%) gave responses indicating IPV with controlling behaviour being the most frequently reported (78/90). Qualitative data indicate that, following consideration of language and diverse understandings of controlling behaviour, settlement service caseworkers were able to identify experiences of harmful forms of control. Conversations about control between caseworkers and women were prompted, and awareness about non-physical coercion increased.
conclusionDespite challenges due to differences in language, interpretation and cultural norms, this study found it feasible to enquire about controlling behaviour with refugee women accessing settlement services, along with other forms of IPV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.