ReviewJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Bone void filler materials for augmentation in comminuted fractures: a comprehensive review.
Review in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bone defect repair materials after bone tumour resection: from structural substitutes to biofunctionalized synergistic therapy.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Outcomes following structural allograft-chain impaction kyphoplasty.North American Spine Society journal · 2026Article
- Overview of Silk Fibroin Injectable Hydrogels: Advances and Applications in Regenerative Medicine.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Modulating Surface Properties and Osteoblast Responses in Bone Regeneration via Positive and Negative Charges during Electrospinning of Poly(l-lactide-ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Injectable Calcium Composite Bone Substitute Augmentation for Osteoporotic Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Prospective, Non-Randomized Controlled Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Comminuted fractures, characterized by multiple bone fragments, present significant challenges in orthopedic surgery. Effective treatment often requires augmentation techniques to enhance fixation stability and promote bone regeneration. This review explores the application of bone void filler materials, including autografts, allografts, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), and synthetic bone substitutes such as calcium phosphate ceramics and bioactive glass, in managing comminuted fractures. Autografts are the gold standard due to their superior osteogenic potential but are limited by donor site morbidity and availability. Allografts mitigate these issues but face concerns regarding immunogenicity and reduced biological activity. PMMA, widely used for structural augmentation, provides immediate stability but suffers from thermal necrosis, polymer shrinkage, and cytotoxic risks. Synthetic bone substitutes, including calcium phosphate cement and bioactive glass, offer promising alternatives by promoting bone integration while reducing complications associated with traditional grafts. However, their mechanical limitations and their artificial nature leave room for improvement. The review highlights recent advancements in biomaterial modifications to improve degradation rates, osteointegration, and mechanical resilience, such as composite materials and ion-doped bio ceramics. Despite these innovations, a gap remains in developing an ideal augmentation material that combines structural integrity with bioactivity. Future research should focus on integrating bioactive elements with load-bearing capabilities to optimize patient outcomes in comminuted fracture management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.