ArticleBMC nursing2025
Adaptation of the incivility in nursing education-revised survey: a validity and reliability study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcademic incivility is one of the most significant issues that disrupt the learning process for nursing students and adversely affects the quality of nursing care. Therefore, it is crucial to assess incivility within the nursing academic environment using valid and reliable measurement tools. The aim of this study is to translate and adapt the Incivility in Nursing Education-Revised (INE-R) Survey into Turkish and assess its validity and reliability for nursing students and faculty.
methodsThe cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the INE-R were carried out within the framework of a methodological cross-sectional study. The Turkish validity and reliability of the INE-R survey, which assesses the behaviors of faculty incivility, were examined with 522 nursing students from 11 different universities, including students from the 2nd, 3rd, 4th year. Data were collected from April 20, 2021 to October 30, 2021.
resultsFollowing the cross-cultural adaptation, the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed that the Turkish version of the INE-R, with 24 items and a two-factor structure, showed a good fit. The reliability analysis revealed Cronbach's alpha of 0.952 for the total score, 0.899 for the low-level incivility subscale, and 0.991 for the high-level incivility subscale. Item analysis indicated that all items had item-total correlation values above 0.30, with none removed. Additionally, removing any item did not improve the scale's Cronbach's alpha. The test-retest results showed no statistically significant differences.
conclusionThe Turkish adaptation of the INE-R demonstrates its validity and reliability as a valuable instrument for assessing the perceptions of Turkish nursing students regarding uncivil faculty behaviors, as well as the frequency of their exposure to such behaviors. IMPACT STATEMENT: INE-R survey has demonstrated psychometric reliability and validity, making it a valuable tool for assessing incivility within nursing academia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.