ArticleBMC medical education2025
Continuing professional development for primary care physicians: a pre-post analysis of a focused abdominal point-of-care ultrasound pilot training.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Point-of-care ultrasound in primary care: time for a standardized Italian curriculum?Journal of ultrasound · 2026Article
- Use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in French urgent primary care: a national survey of general practitioners in the SOS Médecins network.BMC primary care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAbdominal pain is a leading cause of primary care visits and emergency department admissions. The recent surge in the implementation of point-of-care ultrasound into primary care underscores the necessity for specialized training to enhance the expertise of primary care physicians and foster a positive attitude toward its routine use in clinical activities.
methodsThis prospective cohort study, conducted between March and August 2023 at Ben Gurion University, introduced an integrative abdominal ultrasound program for 48 participating primary care physicians with no prior formal experience in abdominal ultrasound. Physicians' knowledge, practical skills, and attitudes towards abdominal ultrasound integration were evaluated using a pre/post-course clips-based pathology test, a hands-on exam immediately following the course, and a survey conducted ten weeks later.
resultsPost-course evaluations showed an improvement in primary care physicians' proficiency with hands-on skills, increasing from 26 to 69% (p < 0.001), with increased comfort using abdominal ultrasound (from 0 to 42%, p < 0.001) and enhanced understanding of its capabilities and limitations (from 0 to 58%, p < 0.001). Pattern recognition skills, assessed through clips, presented a notable rise from an average of 26% to 69% (p < 0.001). Ten weeks following the training, an increase in its utilization was observed; weekly usage rose from zero to 44%, and the proportion not using it declined from 94 to 19% (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively).
conclusionsAn integrative two-day training program increases the application of abdominal bedside ultrasound in clinical settings, demonstrating the effectiveness of combining practical training with flexible, theoretical learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.