Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40340831›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Internet use for health information, health service utilization, and quality of care in the U.S.

Diana Alma Taya, Ying-Chih Chuang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Patient-Provider Discussions About Online Health Information in the Health Information National Trends Survey.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Diana Alma TayaSchool of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, 235 10th Floor, Biomedical Technology Building, No. 301, Yuantong Road, Zhonghe District, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Ying-Chih ChuangSchool of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, 235 10th Floor, Biomedical Technology Building, No. 301, Yuantong Road, Zhonghe District, New Taipei City, Taiwan. yingchih@tmu.edu.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreased internet use for health information in the United States enhances interactions with healthcare professionals, but its effects on healthcare utilization and care quality are still being investigated. We explored the association between internet use for health information, patient-centered communication (PCC), and sociodemographic factors on the likelihood of visiting a health care provider and quality of care. We also examined if PCC mediates this association.

methodsWe conducted a secondary data analysis using the National Cancer Center Institutes (NCI) Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 2018-2020. Multinomial logistic regression and path analyses assessed variable interrelationships and mediating effects.

resultsIndividuals using the internet for health information for themselves were 2.40 times more likely (P <.001) to have frequent provider visits and 1.18 times more likely (P <.022) to rate their care as very good/good compared to excellent, compared to those who did not use the internet for health information for themselves. In contrast, individuals using the internet for discussion with their providers were 2.05 times more likely (P <.001) to have increased visits, and they were 40% less likely (P <.001) to rate their care as fair/poor compared to excellent, relative to those who did not use the internet for discussions. Path analysis indicated that individuals using the internet for health information for themselves may negatively impact PCC, resulting in lower quality ratings, while those who use the internet for discussions with healthcare providers had a positive effect on PCC, leading to higher care ratings.

conclusionThis study enhances our understanding of how PCC and internet use for health information impact US healthcare. Using the internet for provider discussions positively impacts perceived care quality, highlighting PCC's vital role.

Indexed as

Consumer Health InformationInternetInternet UsePatient Acceptance of Health CareQuality of Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CareUnited StatesYoung AdultHealth communicationHealth information exchangeInternet usePatient-Centered careQuality of health care

Identifiers

PMID40340831
PMCPMC12060370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.