ArticleBMC health services research2025
Internet use for health information, health service utilization, and quality of care in the U.S.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge of Syphilis and Human Papillomavirus and Associated Factors in a Japanese University Setting: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Health-Seeking Behaviors After Acute Respiratory Infection Among Urban and Rural Residents and Different Age Groups: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Knowledge Gaps and Barriers to Care in Men with Postprostatectomy Incontinence: Evidence from the German ProKontinenz Trial.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Oral health services use among adults in Brazil: inequities and the role of SUS in mitigating them (SB Brasil 2023).BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Patient-Provider Discussions About Online Health Information in the Health Information National Trends Survey.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2026Article
- Quality assessment of patient-facing urologic telesurgery content using validated tools.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncreased internet use for health information in the United States enhances interactions with healthcare professionals, but its effects on healthcare utilization and care quality are still being investigated. We explored the association between internet use for health information, patient-centered communication (PCC), and sociodemographic factors on the likelihood of visiting a health care provider and quality of care. We also examined if PCC mediates this association.
methodsWe conducted a secondary data analysis using the National Cancer Center Institutes (NCI) Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 2018-2020. Multinomial logistic regression and path analyses assessed variable interrelationships and mediating effects.
resultsIndividuals using the internet for health information for themselves were 2.40 times more likely (P <.001) to have frequent provider visits and 1.18 times more likely (P <.022) to rate their care as very good/good compared to excellent, compared to those who did not use the internet for health information for themselves. In contrast, individuals using the internet for discussion with their providers were 2.05 times more likely (P <.001) to have increased visits, and they were 40% less likely (P <.001) to rate their care as fair/poor compared to excellent, relative to those who did not use the internet for discussions. Path analysis indicated that individuals using the internet for health information for themselves may negatively impact PCC, resulting in lower quality ratings, while those who use the internet for discussions with healthcare providers had a positive effect on PCC, leading to higher care ratings.
conclusionThis study enhances our understanding of how PCC and internet use for health information impact US healthcare. Using the internet for provider discussions positively impacts perceived care quality, highlighting PCC's vital role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.