ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
Sensitivity analysis on protein-protein interaction networks through deep graph networks.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProtein-protein interaction networks (PPINs) provide a comprehensive view of the intricate biochemical processes that take place in living organisms. In recent years, the size and information content of PPINs have grown thanks to techniques that allow for the functional association of proteins. However, PPINs are static objects that cannot fully describe the dynamics of the protein interactions; these dynamics are usually studied from external sources and can only be added to the PPIN as annotations. In contrast, the time-dependent characteristics of cellular processes are described in Biochemical Pathways (BP), which frame complex networks of chemical reactions as dynamical systems. Their analysis with numerical simulations allows for the study of different dynamical properties. Unfortunately, available BPs cover only a small portion of the interactome, and simulations are often hampered by the unavailability of kinetic parameters or by their computational cost. In this study, we explore the possibility of enriching PPINs with dynamical properties computed from BPs. We focus on the global dynamical property of sensitivity, which measures how a change in the concentration of an input molecular species influences the concentration of an output molecular species at the steady state of the dynamical system.
resultsWe started with the analysis of BPs via ODE simulations, which enabled us to compute the sensitivity associated with multiple pairs of chemical species. The sensitivity information was then injected into a PPIN, using public ontologies (BioGRID, UniPROT) to map entities at the BP level with nodes at the PPIN level. The resulting annotated PPIN, termed the DyPPIN (Dynamics of PPIN) dataset, was used to train a DGN to predict the sensitivity relationships among PPIN proteins. Our experimental results show that this model can predict these relationships effectively under different use case scenarios. Furthermore, we show that the PPIN structure (i.e., the way the PPIN is "wired") is essential to infer the sensitivity, and that further annotating the PPIN nodes with protein sequence embeddings improves the predictive accuracy.
conclusionTo the best of our knowledge, the model proposed in this study is the first that allows performing sensitivity analysis directly on PPINs. Our findings suggest that, despite the high level of abstraction, the structure of the PPIN holds enough information to infer dynamic properties without needing an exact model of the underlying processes. In addition, the designed pipeline is flexible and can be easily integrated into drug design, repurposing, and personalized medicine processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.