ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2025
Validation of artificial intelligence algorithm LuxIA for screening of diabetic retinopathy from a single 45° retinal colour fundus images: the CARDS study.
Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study validated the artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm LuxIA for screening more-than-mild diabetic retinopathy (mtmDR) from a single 45° colour fundus image of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM, type 1 or type 2) in Spain. Secondary objectives included validating LuxIA according to the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy (ICDR) classification and comparing its performance between different devices.
methodsIn this multicentre, cross-sectional study, retinal colour fundus images of adults (≥18 years) with DM were collected from five hospitals in Spain (December 2021-December 2022). 45° colour fundus photographs were captured using non-mydriatic Topcon and ZEISS cameras. The Discovery platform (RetinAI) was used to collect images. LuxIA output was an ordinal score (1-5), indicating a classification as mtmDR based on an ICDR severity score.
results945 patients with DM were included; the mean (SD) age was 64.6 (13.5) years. The LuxIA algorithm detected mtmDR with a sensitivity and specificity of 97.1% and 94.8%, respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.96, indicating a high test accuracy. The 95% CI data for overall accuracy (94.8% to 95.6%), sensitivity (96.8% to 98.2%) and specificity (94.3% to 95.1%) indicated robust estimations by LuxIA, which maintained a concordance of classification (N=829, kappa=0.837, p=0.001) when used to classify Topcon images. LuxIA validation on ZEISS-obtained images demonstrated high accuracy (90.6%), specificity (92.3%) and lower sensitivity (83.3%) as compared with Topcon-obtained images.
conclusionsAI algorithms such as LuxIA are increasing testing feasibility for healthcare professionals in DR screening. This study validates the real-world utility of LuxIA for mtmDR screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.