ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2025
Economic and environmental impacts of commercial milk formula in Indonesia: estimates and comparisons using the Cost of Not Breastfeeding, Green Feeding, and Mothers' Milk Tools.
Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSales of commercial milk formula products (CMF) are rising rapidly. This study analysed key economic and environmental impacts CMF feeding in Indonesia, which are often overlooked in policy discussions despite their relevance.
methodsWe assessed the economic and environmental impacts of CMF in Indonesia in 2020 using the Mothers' Milk Tool (MMT), the Green Feeding Tool (GFT) and the Cost of Not Breastfeeding Tool (CONBF). We compared the estimated values from these tools with calculations based on Euromonitor data on CMF retail sales in Indonesia.
resultsIn 2020, according to the MMT, women in Indonesia produced around 455 million litres of breastmilk for infants aged < 6 months, which had an estimated monetary value of US$45.5 billion. The MMT and GFT shows substantial economic losses from displacement of breastfeeding in Indonesia; 62-96 million litres of breastmilk were lost in 2020 compared to the biologically feasible potential. The GFT tool calculates a carbon footprint of 215-274 million kg of CO
conclusionsBreastfeeding's economic importance to Indonesia far exceeds the retail value of CMF sales. Displacing breastfeeding carries high but largely undocumented economic and environmental costs. Losses are greater when measured as a food resource than as health costs, lost lives, or cognitive decline. Environmental impacts based on sales data are higher than those from survey data. Our findings and the discrepancies between tools reveal a critical gap in national statistics and highlight the need to recognise breast milk as an economically valuable, healthy, and sustainable national resource in Indonesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.