ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2025
Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of remimazolam and midazolam for general anesthesia in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of remimazolam on postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer: a randomized controlled trial.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Trial
- Rapid treatment center for depression in China: constructive reflections and transnational implications.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElderly patients are a vulnerable group with high perioperative risks. Thus, reducing the duration of anesthesia is important. Remimazolam is a benzodiazepine sedative commonly used for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia given its rapid induction and rapid recovery. Most reports have focused on nonelderly patients.
aimTo compare the time to loss of consciousness, length of PACU stay and incidence of adverse events in patients older than 65 years who received remimazolam for general anesthesia with those of patients who received midazolam.
methodsThis study was conducted at a university hospital between February 2022 and March 2023. We included 100 patients aged 65 years or older who were scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were divided into 2 groups, namely, the midazolam group and the remimazolam group, with 50 patients in each group. The primary outcome was the time to loss of consciousness. The secondary outcomes included the time to extubation and length of PACU stay. We also recorded the percentage of flumazenil used and incidence of adverse events.
resultsClinical data from 96 patients who were scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia were included in the final analysis, with 46 patients in the remimazolam group and 50 patients in the midazolam group. The time to loss of consciousness was 304 (222, 330) s in the remimazolam group and 95 (67, 25) s in the midazolam group, and the difference was significant (p = 0.000). The time to extubation was 24.93 ± 11.617 min in the remimazolam group and 34.88 ± 19.740 min in the midazolam group, revealing a significant difference (p = 0.003). The length of PACU stay was 55 (48, 64) min in the remimazolam group and 65 (55, 85) min in the midazolam group, and the difference was significant (p = 0.001). The percentage of flumazenil used was 6% in the remimazolam group and 20% in the midazolam group, and the difference was significant (p = 0.003).
conclusionGeneral anesthesia with remimazolam has been shown to be effective and safe for surgery in elderly patients. The time to extubation was significantly shorter, length of PACU stay was shorter, and percentage of flumazenil used was lower in the remimazolam group than in the midazolam group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.