ArticleBMC neurology2025
Woven endobridge embolization versus microsurgical clipping for unruptured wide-neck cerebral aneurysms on middle cerebral artery bifurcation.
Article in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A wide-necked saccular aneurysm of the middle cerebral artery bifurcation with neck atherosclerosis mimicking a fusiform aneurysm: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Perforator-Sparing Microsurgical Clipping of Tandem Dominant-Hemisphere Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: Geometry-Guided Reconstruction of a Wide-Neck Bifurcation and Dorsal M1 Fusiform Lesion.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Woven EndoBridge (WEB) is an endovascular treatment for wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms (WNBAs). This study aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of the WEB comparing to clipping for treating the middle cerebral artery (MCA) WNBAs. For the matched analysis, we designed a retrospective, tertiary, single-center study including 288 MCA WNBAs treated with WEB (n = 37) or clipping (n = 251). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) for the main analysis and 1:2 propensity score matching for the sensitivity analysis were used to adjust for aneurysm geometric parameters. Morbidity, major complications, and aneurysm occlusion grade were assessed at 1 year. In the IPTW analysis, no significant difference was observed in morbidity (2.1% vs. 1.6%, odds ratio [OR]: 1.34, p = 0.776) and major complications (3.3% vs. 3.1%, OR: 1.08, p = 0.926). Adequate aneurysm occlusion was achieved in 76.1% of the WEB group and 97.4% of the clipping group (OR: 0.09, p < 0.001). In line with the main analysis, the 1:2 propensity score matching analysis revealed no significant difference in the morbidity (OR: 2.00, 95% CI: 0.13-31.98, p = 0.624). This study supports that microsurgical clipping still requires to play a vital role, but WEB could be an alternative option for WNBAs in the MCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.