SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Midwives' experiences with implementation of active management of third stage of labor in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobally, post-partum hemorrhage (PPH) remains the leading cause of maternal mortality, and active management of the third stage of labor (AMTSL) serves as an effective solution to this critical childbirth and maternal health issue. However, adherence to AMTSL guidelines remains low in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA): thus, midwives' experiences are essential for interventions aimed at scaling-up AMTSL use. In this study, we identify, appraise, synthesize, and evaluate empirical qualitative evidence on midwives' experiences with AMTSL implementation in SSA.
methodsThe review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus, focusing on qualitative studies published between 2003 and 2021, which examined midwives' experiences with the implementation of AMTSL. Keywords such as "active management of the third stage of labor," "postpartum hemorrhage," "maternal mortality," "experiences of midwives," and "sub-Saharan Africa" helped us retrieve 450 articles, which were scaled down to four after applying the inclusion criteria. The thematic analysis, thus reports findings from the four papers.
findingsFive key themes emerged, namely: familiarity with AMTSL; benefits of AMTSL; experiences of midwives with the application of AMTSL; barriers to the implementation; and how to improve implementation. These themes reveal nuances regarding how midwives come to know, apply, and navigate the execution challenges as well as how to promote AMTSL implementation. For illustration, training in AMTSL improves knowledge, yet skepticism persists despite its importance in preventing PPH. Many midwives do not consistently follow all procedures due to barriers like heavy workloads and the unavailability of oxytocin. To enhance AMTSL use, teamwork, delegation, communication, and ensuring oxytocin availability were recommendations proffered.
conclusionMidwives' implementation of AMTSL reduces PPH and enhances maternal outcomes, despite the lingering implementation challenges they encounter, especially in low-resource settings. Policies must encourage its use by ensuring the availability of high-quality oxytocin, including proper storage conditions to address shortages, and in addition, priority be assigned to in-service training on its implementation. Finally, ensuring flexible work routines and effective teamwork can also help scale up AMTSL administration and compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.