ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Preoperative immune prognostic index predicts the prognosis and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy benefits of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Role ofJournal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe utility of the immune prognostic index (IPI) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has yet to be established after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). The purpose of this study was to investigate the value of IPI in predicting the prognosis and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) benefits of ESCC patients.
methodsBetween January 2011 and December 2018, 613 ESCC patients underwent MIE at our center and were divided into two groups: low IPI and high IPI.Log-rank tests were used to compare the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients in different groups based on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Differences in clinical characteristics between groups were eliminated by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. To identify independent risk factors influencing OS and DFS, the Cox proportional risk model was used.
resultsIn comparison to the high IPI group, the low IPI group had a better 5-year OS and DFS in both the entire and matched cohorts (P < 0.05). IPI was found to be an independent prognostic factor for OS and DFS in a multivariate analysis of the entire cohort and the matched cohort (P < 0.05). In subgroup analyses of most clinicopathological factors, high IPI was associated with a higher risk of death or recurrence in the matched cohorts. When combined with 8th TNM staging, the 5-year OS and DFS of stage II or III patients with low IPI in the AC group were not different from those in the non-AC group (P > 0.05), and AC of stage III patients with high IPI significantly prolonged 5-year OS and DFS (OS: 37.4% vs 26.2%, P = 0.018; DFS: 33.6% vs 19.8%, P = 0.042).
conclusionPreoperative IPI is a promising predictor of ESCC after MIE. For stage III ESCC patients with high IPI, AC can significantly reduce the risk of death or recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.