ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Application of machine learning in identifying risk factors for low APGAR scores.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimized ensemble learning framework for neonatal asphyxia prediction using perinatal clinical features.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying the risk factors for low APGAR scores at birth is critical for improving neonatal outcomes and guiding clinical interventions.
methodsThis study aimed to develop a machine-learning model that predicts low APGAR scores by incorporating maternal, fetal, and perinatal factors in Wad Medani, Sudan. Using a Random Forest Classifier, we performed hyper-parameter optimization through Grid Search cross-validation (CV) to identify the best-performing model configuration.
resultsThe optimized model achieved excellent predictive performance, as evidenced by high F1 scores, accuracy, and balanced precision-recall metrics on the test set. In addition to prediction, feature importance analysis was conducted to identify the most influential risk factors contributing to low APGAR scores. Key predictors included gestational age, maternal BMI, mode of delivery, and history of previous complications such as stillbirth or abortion. Using 5-fold cross-validation (CV), the random forest model performance scored accuracy at 96%, precision at 98%, recall at 97%, and F1-score at 97% when classifying infants with APGAR score.
conclusionThis study underscores the importance of incorporating machine learning approaches in obstetric care to understand better and mitigate the risk factors associated with adverse neonatal outcomes, particularly low APGAR scores. The results provide a foundation for developing targeted interventions and improving prenatal care practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.