Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40340379›Full record

ArticleNeurology2025

Association of Outpatient Follow-Up With 30-Day Readmission After Epilepsy or Seizure Discharge in Medicare Beneficiaries Aged 65 and Older.

Leah J Blank, Grace Van Hyfte, Parul Agarwal, Madhu Mazumdar, Nathalie Jette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leah J BlankDivision of Health Outcomes and Knowledge Translation Research, Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0001-8719-6752
Grace Van HyfteDepartment of Population Health and Policy, Institute for Healthcare Delivery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; and.
Parul AgarwalDivision of Health Outcomes and Knowledge Translation Research, Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-7497-8162
Madhu MazumdarDepartment of Population Health and Policy, Institute for Healthcare Delivery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; and.
Nathalie JetteDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1351-5866

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesOlder adults are expected to have higher readmission rates after seizure-related hospitalization. We sought to define the 30-day readmission rate for older adults after seizure hospitalization and to examine whether occurrence, timing, or specialization of follow-up with primary or neuro-related care is associated with lower readmission risk.

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study using 2016-2019 Medicare claims data, including adults aged older than 65 years hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of seizure/epilepsy. The primary outcome was readmission within 30 days. Exposure of interest was presence or absence of follow-up and specialty of the follow-up provider. Beneficiaries were followed from 90 days before admission to 30 days after discharge. We defined variables a priori based on literature/clinical judgment and used a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method to determine factors that were contributing to the data's variance for inclusion in the final model.

resultsOf 80,620 beneficiaries with admissions for seizure/epilepsy, 17.72% were readmitted within 30 days. Overall, 20.6% saw only primary care, 2.5% neurology only, 0.3% neurosurgery only, and 0.1% epilepsy only, and 5.4% had a combination of visits. Readmission rates differed by follow-up visit status: 22% readmission rate for those with no follow-up and only 6% with any health care visit. Among those with a visit, the readmission rates by specialty were as follows: 8% for primary care alone, 5% for neurology alone, 16% for neurosurgery alone, 1% for epileptology alone, and 2% for those who had seen a combination of these specialties. In our LASSO-selected multivariable model, outpatient follow-up was associated with lower odds of readmission: early (days 1-15) primary care visit (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.49; 95% CI 0.45-0.52, DISCUSSION: We found high rates of readmission in older adults. Outpatient follow-up was associated with reduced odds of readmission. These findings reinforce the importance of discharge planning and suggest that ensuring outpatient follow-up with either primary care or neurology may be an easy intervention to reduce readmissions.

Indexed as

AftercareEpilepsyPatient ReadmissionSeizuresAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMedicareOutpatientsPatient DischargeRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40340379
PMCPMC12063235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.