Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40340255›Full record

ArticlePlant communications2025

Bacterial community-emitted volatiles regulate Arabidopsis growth and root architecture in a distinct manner of those from individual strains.

Gözde Merve Türksoy, Miroslav Berka, Kathrin Wippel, Anna Koprivova, Réjane Audrey Carron, Lioba Rüger, Martin Černý, Tonni Grube Andersen, Stanislav Kopriva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Influence ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gözde Merve TürksoyMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Carl-von-Linne-Weg 10, 50829 Cologne, Germany; Institute for Plant Sciences, Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences (CEPLAS), University of Cologne, Cologne 50674, Germany.
Miroslav BerkaDepartment of Molecular Biology and Radiobiology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Kathrin WippelMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Carl-von-Linne-Weg 10, 50829 Cologne, Germany; Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Anna KoprivovaInstitute for Plant Sciences, Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences (CEPLAS), University of Cologne, Cologne 50674, Germany.
Réjane Audrey CarronMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Carl-von-Linne-Weg 10, 50829 Cologne, Germany.
Lioba RügerMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Carl-von-Linne-Weg 10, 50829 Cologne, Germany.
Martin ČernýDepartment of Molecular Biology and Radiobiology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Tonni Grube AndersenMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Carl-von-Linne-Weg 10, 50829 Cologne, Germany. Electronic address: tandersen@mpipz.mpg.de.
Stanislav KoprivaInstitute for Plant Sciences, Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences (CEPLAS), University of Cologne, Cologne 50674, Germany. Electronic address: skopriva@uni-koeln.de.

Funding

Non-US Government Research Support type
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) function as infochemicals and are important means of communication between bacteria and plants. Bacterial VOCs can promote plant growth and protect plants against both biotic and abiotic stresses. Most studies to date have focused on VOCs from single bacterial strains; consequently, very little is known about VOCs emitted by bacterial communities and their role in modulating plant phenotypes. In this work, we showed that VOCs from a root-derived 16-strain synthetic community affect Arabidopsis growth and root system architecture, whereas VOCs from individual strains produce a range of different effects. Removal of key species from the community changed the relative abundances of other strains and altered the VOC composition; however, the effect on plant growth remained the same. We therefore concluded that bacterial VOC-induced modulation of plant responses in the rhizosphere may be an emergent property of bacterial communities, rather than merely the sum of effects exerted by individual species. In total, we detected 135 different volatiles from individual strains, with dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) being the most abundant compound emitted by the community. Correlation analysis predicted several sulfur-containing compounds to promote plant growth, and revealed that exposure to two such VOCs, along with DMDS, leads to plant growth promotion. We also identified plant mutants unresponsive to DMDS, suggesting that its mechanism of action may involve assimilation into S-methylcysteine. Finally, we propose that the ecological role of VOCs is to provide early signaling alerts that prime plants for interaction with the bacterial community through modulation of root exudate composition and accumulation of defense compounds, thereby affecting the bacterial colonization of the plants.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisBacteriaPlant RootsVolatile Organic CompoundsRhizosphereVolatile Organic CompoundsArabidopsisbacterial volatilesdimethyl disulfideplant–microbe interactionssulfursynthetic communities

Identifiers

PMID40340255
PMCPMC12177503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.